Book Review of Glued To Games
radios, 12 volt electronics, translators, electrical exam prep, spy gadgets
Bookmark and Share
Amazon Store eBay Store Walmart Store Articles  Brainpower Newsletter Contact Us     Home  Search

Request to be put on our jokelist, one joke daily and a lot of original stuff you won't get anywhere else


This page is the original source of this review, though you may also find it on Amazon or other sites.

Book Reviews Home   Free Audio Books
Glued To Games

Book Review of: Glued To Games

How video games draw us in and hold us spellbound

Price: $34.95

Availability: Usually shipswithin 24 hours
Click on the image to order or find more books like this.

Review of Glued To Games, by Dr. Scott Rigby and Dr. Richard M. Ryan (Hardcover, 2011)

(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you want a hardcopy)


Insightful, informative, surprising

The authors did a good job with this book. I like the fact they make a non-gamer reader feel included by explaining gaming-specific items rather than leaving the reader feel clueless. On this particular topic, I had scant knowledge before reading this book. To me, the very limited time I have on this earth means I am just not going to do some things. Long ago, I put video games in that box of what I am not going to do.

But like any choice, this one means I am giving up something. As games have greatly evolved since their early days (when I made that choice), that "something" has become fairly significant. Video games do offer benefits beyond what we non-gamers typically know about. And, of course, they have their drawbacks. The authors explore both of these areas, while explaining what makes video gaming so compelling to so many people.

The authors also explore the hyperbole, disinformation, and denials about game content. Some fascinating reading, there.

So if you're not a gamer, is this book a waste of time to read? I don't think so. For one thing, you probably know (and misunderstand) someone who spends a fair amount of time with video games. And video gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry. Its market goes well beyond the original demographic (school children), to include all ages and most walks of life.

Most of us are aware that the Space Program has produced benefits in mainstream society (Tang not withstanding). Gaming shares such a legacy.

For example, as I type this I am viewing the text on a monitor that incorporates features originally developed to improve the video game experience. I remember when a 16-bit video card was a big deal, too. The video card that drives this monitor's display runs on a special bus and has so many bits I can't remember them all. :)

So, extremely sharp display with no refresh issues or redraw ghosts. If not for gaming, neither this monitor nor this video card would exist.

None of this convinces me to get into gaming. I simply don't have the time, and I get the benefits (which the authors identify) via other means.

Some of the benefits touted by gaming advocates do not exist. The authors explore this and debunk some misconceptions. They also look at nontransferable skills gained in gaming. I was surprised that they didn't assess the brain plasticity related benefits that gaming probably produces.

While the authors, who are gamers themselves, do give an overall positive impression of gaming, they were careful not to dismiss its darker side out of hand. Nor do they use the "salesy" tactic of addressing objections or concerns with false arguments. Their approach seemed honest and genuine, and they backed their statements with research. This required, of course, acknowledgement of the addicts in the gaming world. They actually discussed a couple of case histories indepth.

I think it would be difficult to write a balanced book on this topic, but the authors fairly well pulled that off. I mean if you're not a gamer, then obviously you have a lower opinion of gaming than a gamer does.

And I think there's not much middle ground in terms of how people see gaming. The reason is similar to that of any "extreme" activity. You don't dally around with it. You're either committed, or you don't participate. Consider dance. I took dancing lessons and enjoyed the activity. But continuing forward would have been too much of a time commitment so I quit. I think gaming is like that.

I don't mean to say gamers have no life outside of gaming. That would be a false assertion, though there are gamers who fit that description. But then, you find fanatics in all kinds of hobbies and fields of interest. We all know at least one sports fan who seems to live for that particular sport or, as a spectator, a particular team.

The authors draw on their own experiences in game development and game playing, experiences of specific gamers, and a staggering amount of literature and research relevant to the topic. On this last item, fact-aholics will be happy to note that many of the sources are primary sources. As someone who is quick to shoot down ill-researched opinion posing as non-fiction, I believe the authors endeavored to make this book as accurate as possible.

The authors also chose a writing style that's conversational, yet authoritative. That's a good tone for this kind of work, in my opinion. It makes the book highly readable, without any "dumbing down" being evident.

A final observation about the writing. The trend in recent years has been to reduce publishing costs by cutting back on, or eliminating entirely, the proofreading process. This book does not appear to have suffered from that. The text is really clean. That, to me, scores big points.

So, that's my overall view of this book. I won't get into the details of what the authors conclude, because the most accurate way to understand the conclusions is to read the book.

This book consists of nine chapters occupying 173 pages, with the research notes presented as back notes at the end of each chapter. It also has a well-written introduction and an extensive index.




About these reviews

You may be wondering why the reviews here are any different from the hundreds of "reviews" posted online. Notice the quotation marks?

I've been reviewing books for sites like Amazon for many years now, and it dismays me that Amazon found it necessary to post a minimum word count for reviews. It further dismays me that it's only 20 words. If that's all you have to say about a book, why bother?

And why waste everyone else's time with such drivel? As a reader of such reviews, I feel like I am being told that I do not matter. The flippancy of people who write these terse "reviews" is insulting to the authors also, I would suspect.

This sound bite blathering taking the place of any actual communication is increasingly a problem in our mindless, blog-posting Webosphere. Sadly, Google rewards such pointlessness as "content" so we just get more if this inanity.

My reviews, contrary to current (non) standards, actually tell you about the book. I always got an "A" on a book review I did as a kid (that's how I remember it anyhow, and it's my story so I'm sticking to it). A book review contains certain elements and has a logical structure. It informs the reader about the book.

A book review may also tell the reader whether the reviewer liked it, but revealing a reviewer's personal taste is not necessary for an informative book review.

About your reviewer

  • Books are a passion of mine. I read dozens of them each year, plus I listen to audio books.
  • Most of my "reading diet" consists of nonfiction. I think life is too short to use your limited reading time on material that has little or no substance. That leads into my next point...
  • In 1990, I stopped watching television. I have not missed it. At all.
  • I was first published as a preteen. I wrote an essay, and my teacher submitted it to the local paper.
  • For six years, I worked as an editor for a trade publication. I left that job in 2002, and still do freelance editing and authoring for that publication (and for other publications).
  • No book has emerged from my mind onto the best-seller list. So maybe I'm presumptuous in judging the work of others. Then again, I do more describing than judging in my reviews. And I have so many articles now published that I stopped counting them at 6,000. When did I stop? Probably 20,000 articles ago! (It's been a while).
  • I have an engineering degree and an MBA, among other "quant" degrees. That helps explain my methodical approach toward reviews.
  • You probably don't know anybody who has made a perfect or near perfect score on a test of Standard Written English. I have. So, a credential for whatever it's worth.

About reading style

No, I do not "speed read" through these. That said, I do read at a fast rate. But, in contrast to speed reading, I read everything when I read a book for review.

Speed reading is a specialized type of reading that requires skipping text as you go. Using this technique, I've been able to consistently "max out" a speed reading machine at 2080 words per minute with 80% comprehension. This method is great if you are out to show how fast you can read. But I didn't use it in graduate school and I don't use it now. I think it takes the joy out of reading, and that pleasure is a big part of why I read.

Articles | Book Reviews | Free eNL | Products

Contact Us | Home

This material, copyright Mindconnection. Don't make all of your communication electronic. Hug somebody!