| 
| In this issue:Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness | 
Factoid | Thought 4 the Day
 |  
|  |  | Please forward this to others who might find 
it useful. If you have a  
social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link: 
https://www.mindconnection.com |  |  |  Please help me get a wider audience. Simply post a link to this 
newsletter in the comments of any article you read online:
https://www.mindconnection.com/library/enlarchives/2023/enl2023-11-19.htm 1. Good News: Where the Intel is Good
| Defending Against Hate 
		https://youtu.be/D5R1iAvKavo 
		The Junior Senator from Kansas on helping Israel.
		https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1721612254536188205 MTG.Tlaib is becoming increasingly radioactive, and several Democrats 
		have already distanced themselves from her. Another member of The Squad 
		is about to take a fall and not come back. Two down, two to go. They 
		have added two more morons, but said morons don't have much pull and 
		probably never will.And, this whacko was officially censored by the House of 
		Representatives. Let's hope the voters in her District do the same 
		thing. She doesn't deserve to be in Congress, she deserves to be in a 
		padded cell. Fighting Communism 
		House Republicans are using their power of the purse strings to 
		fight communism, through a series of amendments to a government funding 
		bill. As reported in Blabber Buzz, "One such amendment, proposed by Rep. 
		Mike Collins, R-Ga., seeks to stop funding for the office of Vice 
		President Kamala Harris. Several other amendments are aimed at the White 
		House Office of Gun Violence Prevention. In a bold move, Rep. Marjorie 
		Taylor Greene, R-Ga., has proposed an amendment to reduce the salary of 
		Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Daniel Werfel to a mere $1. 
		The Offices of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (ODEIA) 
		within the Biden administration have also been targeted by the GOP's 
		cost-cutting proposals. Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., has proposed an 
		amendment to defund the Treasury's ODEIA, while Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., 
		has targeted the Office of Personnel Management with a similar 
		amendment."
See this 2 page document:
		
		https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-398244A1.pdf. That's 
		quite scary! I wish the author had a better grasp of grammar ("laying 
		fallow" instead of "lying fallow") but otherwise it was well-written. 
		Please share that with other people, because awareness of this 
		particular tumor in the socialist cancer would really help people to 
		understand why it is so vital that we support Republican candidates for 
		the House. Even if you are registered Democrat, you need to support the 
		Republican running for the House seat in your district; this will 
		actually help save your party (think about why that is). So share it 
		with your Democrat friends and let them see this example of vastly 
		destructive overreach that their DINO party is embarking on. And point 
		out there are so few Democrats in the DINO party that only Republicans 
		can stop the cancer from killing the host.
I finally decided to check "Obamacare" (the unaffordabe care act 
		scam). Asking for the minimum "coverage" I found the monthly rate was 
		about $900 per scammer (er, I mean "health care insurance provider"). 
		Even if I qualified for a govt subsidy, the fact remains this is 
		excessively expensive insurance. And it's not the government that 
		subsidizes, it's all of us. If all of use got "free" Obummercare, we'd 
		simply be taxed $900+ a month somehow to cover the subsidies. By 
		refusing this insurance and refusing any possible subsidy, I am helping 
		to fight communism (the elitist govt controls the means of production 
		and distribution, and citizens have no property rights).
The censoring of Tliab was the first salvo that really hurt the 
		socialists. The next salvo is impeachment of Alejandro "refuses to 
		answer the question" Mayorkas. That is combined with an attempt to 
		reduce his salary to $1, which would still leave him overpaid by $1.
The National Small Business Association is fighting hard to stop 
		this mis-legislation that clearly was intended to destroy the vast 
		majority of small businesses in the USA. Read the full story here:
		
		https://www.nsba.biz/post/news-cta-survey-will-cost-small-business-8k-in-year-one 
		
		
		https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1724497683316981945 
		"Oversight Chair @JamesComer scorches delusional liar Democrat Rep. 
		Jared Moskowitz for his pathetic attempt at muddying the waters around 
		the Biden family corruption scandal" The Ongoing Covid Scam: Tidbits 
		The government of Germany is sitting on millions of doses of the 
		clot shot. While the gas chambers worked well for psychopaths in the 
		1940s, the toxic injection thing isn't going so well in Germany in 2022 
		and 2023. As reported in Frontline News, "Earlier this year the 
		government threw out 29 million doses of the COVID-19 vaccine after 
		discarding 54 million doses at the end of 2022, resulting in a €1.6 
		billion ($1.7 billion) loss. As recently as June the German government 
		was sitting on 120 million unused doses and has purchased approximately 
		14.1 million more for the XBB 1.5 variant. But only 2.5 million people 
		have received at least one booster, leaving the German government facing 
		a total loss of more than €4 billion ($4.3 billion) according to rough 
		estimates." My advice to the German government? Destroy every dose of 
		the toxic injections and sue the manufacturers for the purchase price 
		and disposal costs.
The experimental gene therapy that is dishonestly called a "vaccine" 
		affects genes. No surprise there. Now we know it damages genes, that's 
		its effect. It makes the spike protein factory persistent, causing a 
		state of permanent immunity loss and myocarditis risk in the jab victim. 
		Genes are inherited. That should also be no surprise. Thus, there is a 
		huge demand for sperm from men who never got jabbed (aka, the 
		"unvaccinated").
		https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1614695096666161152 Ernesto, 
		talking about his son (a "vaccine" victim).
		https://x.com/annmforti/status/1725735151651467489 Ann Forti, 
		talking about her son (a "vaccine" victim).   |    2. Product Highlight
| The Rocket Pen is a life-changer for students and adults with reading 
difficulties. Scan words or lines from any screen (e.g., tablet, smart phone, 
computer) or printed material, and it not only reads to you but provides word 
definitions, word breakdown, and more to teach you to read (by "you" we mean the 
person you buy this for). The Rocket Pen Reader gives the reading-challenged 
their independence. 
Buy the Rocket Pen on Amazon 
| eBay |
Walmart 
Watch this demo video: 
https://youtu.be/DQd4MBpv4B8 
These features were added with the latest release: 
	Has dictionary lockout and ExamRead feature, so it doubles as an exam 
	pen.Left-hand user mode.Scan left to right mode.Fast shutdown.Selectable voices for playback of scanned text.Selectable UI language: English (default) or Spanish. 
Other features and benefits: 
	Allows students or adults with reading difficulties to gain independence 
	and reading fluency without stigma.Reading tutor functions include spelling, syllabication (how the word is 
	"built"), and one word displayed in big font.Syllables break for each word.Direct lookup of phrasal verbs and idiomatic expressions (for example, 
	get ahead, get along, keep on, keep off, look forward to).Uses colors for the different fields, to improve the understanding of 
	the dictionary definition.
You scan, it reads to you.Scans lines of text or individual words from almost any surface, not 
	just paper. It can read the text on a computer, tablet, or phone.Hear individual words or even multiple lines of text read aloud in natural voice.
Completely self-contained, no computer or Wi-Fi required.Comes ready to use, no setup process (but customization can easily be 
	done).Full 1.9 inch color touch screen, and simple physical buttons for 
	screenless scan and read.
Multiple built-in dictionaries to search definitions including the New 
	Oxford American Dictionary (over twice the size of what the cPen uses) with Oxford Thesaurus of English (Americanized), 
	Oxford American Children’s Dictionary with Oxford American Children’s 
	Thesaurus, and English to Spanish dictionary.Built-in speaker automatically mutes when earbuds are used, 
	automatically unmutes when they aren't.Meets FCC, ROHS, and CE standards.Package includes ReaderPen, USB charging cable, Quick Start Guide, and 
	earphones.  | 
 |  
| The Rocket Pen Reader is an affordable, powerful reading assistant and reading 
tutor that erases the barriers created by dyslexia and other reading problems. 
It can be used privately in the classroom, avoiding stigma, thanks to the 
earbuds included in the kit (it can alternatively be used without earbuds). 
How it teaches reading Before the early 1980s, public schools relied on phonics to teach reading. 
This allowed any student to "sound out" a new, unfamiliar word and also 
recognize its root and thereby often grasp its meaning even without a 
dictionary. Then schools switched to the "Look See" method, which treated words 
as individual pictograms to memorize. The results were dismal, plummeting the 
USA from the top of the literacy ranks to the bottom among industrialized 
countries. The Rocket Pen puts phonics back in. It also adds a context-driven dictionary and a context-driven thesaurus, both 
powerful tools for improving reading skills. See the reading tutor functions in 
the chart below. It is the answer
 The Rocket Pen Reader is the answer for helping the reading-challenged in the 
classroom, special needs classes, home-schooling, and adult education. Because 
of its mobile-friendly design, you can carry it with you and use it anywhere. 
Not only does it read to you, it helps you learn to read (for example, by 
showing you the syllable breakdown and the definition). It is super easy to use, 
no need to watch a dozen videos to figure out what to do.
 Based on the highly 
successful ReadingPen 2 and vastly superior to the cPen Reader Pen, the 
RocketPen is the latest generation in a reading tutor scanning pen. It is a 
quantum leap or two beyond anything else on the market. This amazing device 
retails for $499, sells for $399 on Amazon and Walmart.com, but is on sale 
now for a limited time only via our eBay store at only $379! It beats the competition Compare the Rocket Pen to the competition. The winner here is obvious: 
	
		
			
		
		
			
				| 
 | Rocket Pen | cPen Reader | Orcam Read |  
				| Amazon Price | 399 | 285 | 1990 |  
				| Color touchscreen | Yes | No | No |  
				| Words appear in large font | Yes | No | No |  
				| Scans phones, tablets, etc. | Yes | No | Yes |  
				| Scans blocks of text | Yes | No | Yes |  
				| Color-coded dictionary | Yes | No | No |  
				| Simple physical buttons | Yes | Yes | Yes |  
				| Ergonomic for kids | Yes | No | No |  
				| English and Spanish | Yes | Yes | Yes |  
				| Verbal commands | No | No | Yes |  
				| Auto trigger upon contact | Yes | Yes | No |  
				| Easy menu navigation | Yes | No | No |  
				| Manufacturer experience, yrs | 30 | 8 | 5 |  
				| Product age | Latest generation! | 8 | 5 |  
				| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 |  
				| Reading Tutor Functions | 
 | 
 | 
 |  
				| Dictionary 1 | New Oxford American | Oxford Primary | n/a |  
				| Dictionary 2 | Oxford American Children’s | n/a | n/a |  
				| Thesaurus 1 | New Oxford American | Oxford Primary | n/a |  
				| Thesaurus 2 | Oxford American Children’s | n/a | n/a |  
				| Syllablication / word breakdown | Yes | No | No |  
				| Hear word spelled out | Yes | No | No |  
				| See word spelled out | Yes | No | No |  
				| Part of speech | Yes | Yes | No |  
				| Color coding in dictionary | Yes | No | No |  
				| Headword | Yes | Yes | No |  
				| Pronunciation guide | Yes | No | No |  
				| Idioms | Yes | No | No |  
				| Quick Define feature | Yes | No | No |    |  3. Brainpower tip  
| A long-time friend who is a liberal (but not a libtard) got into a friendly 
exchange with me, where he was referencing the New York Times. The issue at hand 
was socialism. He just doesn't see it as the mental illness it is. He actually 
sees it as something to aspire to, even though it has always left a trail of 
impoverishment wherever it has been tried. Liberals hold up the Scandinavian 
countries as examples of socialism success. What they don't know, because they 
live in a echo chamber and rely on socialism cheerleading rags like the NTY, is 
the Scandinavian countries have been backpedalling on socialist programs and 
policies. That is, rejecting them and going back to non-socialist ones. These 
countries started off wealthy, unlike most countries that go into socialism. 
Most countries that try it start out poor and end up even more poor. Some, like 
Venezuela, start off wealthy and end up totally devastated. The Scandinavian 
countries saw themselves heading down this same path and "reversed their 
thrusters". And socialism inevitably impoverishing? Because when you remove the 
motivation to work hard or to innovate, you no longer get hard work or 
innovation. A major strength of the Scandinavian nations was their work ethic. 
That went away among their youth, with young people staying on the dole and not 
working. When they did work, they did so almost grudgingly. You can see this 
reflected in the fortunes of companies like Nokia, once a major player. You now 
see this playing out in the USA. Small business owners (who provide the vast 
majority of jobs) report in survey after survey that they can't find people who 
are reliable and willing to work. I explained the Scandinavian results to my friend, who replied that he'd 
never heard of such a thing. I told him of course not, extremely biased 
disinformation sources like the NYT doesn't publish the truth so he won't find 
it there. He replied that he trusted the NYT and then he disparaged the Wall 
Street Journal as if I am stupid enough to trust that publisher of 
disinformation. In his world, the WSJ is the "right wing" alternative to the NYT 
and people align themselves with one or the other. In reality, they both lead 
you to a badly distorted view of the world. Both are tertiary sources, and such 
sources are inherently unreliable. He automatically assumed since I wasn't in 
the NYT echo chamber I must be in the WSJ echo chamber, and he made that 
assumption due to the "us vs. them" propaganda of the left. Below is what I wrote to him. Some good brainpower lessons are in this 
response, see if you can identify them: My response about "sources" You should not trust the NYT. It is extremely biased and it seems almost as 
if they have a fact checking team removing facts. The rag is into political 
propagandizing, not reporting. I won't subscribe to WSJ, either--another 
fact-averse rag. Like the NYT, it is based in NYC so everything is seen through 
that cultural lens. But the world is much bigger than NYC.  It is likely the case that every publisher of "news" has to slant it to 
appeal to their subscriber base. This is why I have avoided all "news" sources 
for decades--they are tertiary sources so inherently suspect. Primary sources, 
such as actual videos of events taking place, are inherently authentic. That 
kind of information is heavily censored, but it can be found.  I do read non-news magazines, and I learn a lot that way. I'm just not up on 
the latest narratives except for what people tell me. And what they tell me is 
almost always wrong. I generally don't cite "sources" because I don't believe 
they can be trusted. People will see what they want to see, and that's how they 
choose which sources to trust--the ones that align with what they already 
believe. Echo chambers abound.  Often, you just need to understand the subject. Socialism, for example, 
always ends badly and that is an inherent effect of it. We have over a century 
of case histories, and so far not a single "win". And there never will be. The 
same goes for unregulated capitalism, which is another name for cronyism.  Sometimes, it's very easy to spot the BS. When Fauci and the CDC blathered 
about wearing a dust mask to stop a biohazard, I went back to my third grade 
math and determined that 300 is over 4 times as big as 70. And that's just the 
filter medium and its maximum capacity. The spec is the mask filters out "up to" 
95% of particles .300 nm or larger. Did you know that I own up to 95% of the 
nuclear missiles in the world, in addition to holding up to 95% of its gold 
bullion?  I have also had sex with up to 95% of famous actresses. "Up to 95%" includes 
any number from 95 down to zero. When they called the experimental gene therapy 
a vaccine, I smelled a rat. When they said taking it was necessary to stop 
transmission, I was unable to observe a single vaxxed person duly encapsulated 
in a hermetic bubble (the only thing that can stop transmission). I didn't need 
some newspaper or some studies to inform me, just understanding basic facts and 
applying common sense was sufficient to sort the BS from the reality.  Once I got my hands on the Pfizer trial document, I saw this scam for what it 
really is. I have attached that for your perusal, and I am sure the NYT has been 
totally quiet about this devastating (to the scam) information. Pfizer knew 
their drug was neither safe nor effective. It took attorneys filing multiple 
FOIAs to get this. Now jab victims are winning one lawsuit after another.  ===  Anyhow, I would never make our friendship conditional on your agreeing with 
me on larger social issues or anything else. And I know you would cop that 
attitude either. Besides, nobody in power cares what either of us thinks. And 
there's the fact I don't like echo chambers. I would really start to worry if 
everyone I know agreed with me on most everything. I would conclude we have all 
been snookered. |  4. Finance tip
| Have you been fooled by the federal jobs reports? Allegedly, unemployment is 
down. As economists say, "In relation to what?" And therein lies the key to 
understanding this big lie. Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS, 
or "BS" if you want to be accurate) publishes the data on how many Americans 
hold jobs, how many are officially unemployed, etc. Then they massively revise 
the historical data and publish the current data unrevised the same way. This 
creates massively distorted numbers. For example, let's say (for simplicity's sake) last month there were 10,000 
Americans working but this month there are 9,950 working. That's a significant 
decrease. But if we go back and revise the historical data (coming up with some 
rationale that we don't apply to the current numbers), then last month there 
were 9,000 Americans working and this month 9,950. That's a significant 
increase. The Biden misadministration has been doing this kind of revision to every 
economic indicator the federal government publishes. This is why those numbers 
do not align with what you see in the real world of buying groceries or finding 
a better-paying job. Those numbers do not align with the massive increase of 
small business debt, consumer credit card debt, mortgage rates, apartment 
leasing costs, automobile costs, etc. Nor do they align with the nearly total 
disappearance of affordable business credit. On this last point, we used to be able to get an unsecured 18 month loan at 
less than 2% APR--even as late as President Trump's last year in office. Now, 
not even three years into the coup, we are being pitched 5 month loans at 60% 
APR (no typo, sixty percent) dozens of times per week (mostly e-mail, but also 
robo-dialers). A lot of small business owners don't understand the math and are 
taking these loans. Before the coup, these loan sharks charged 30% APR; their 
cost has doubled. What about those sources that offered the <2% APR loans? They 
have risen to about 7%, but the terms are typically 6 to 8 months. Capital is 
much more expensive, much harder to get, and much harder to service. On this 
last point, being able to service it, that's because revenues are sharply down. 
Many small businesses are scraping along at 20% or so of what they were earning 
before the coup. And yet, the socialists would have us believe the economy is strong. That's 
like expecting us to believe a dust mask protects you from a biohazard, pretty 
stupid isn't it? Since the numbers are obviously false and your experiences are obviously 
true, what are you to do? Here are some tips: 
	Point out the farce to people you know, especially if they usually vote 
	Democrat. Don't argue, just explain.Identify ways you waste money. Even small ways add up, for example 
	standing in front of the freezer with the door open to get ice cubes, 
	instead of removing the tray, closing the door, getting your cubes, and 
	putting the tray back. Standing in your doorway to speak to someone on your 
	porch in the winter is another way of essentially writing a check for an 
	extra payment to the utility company. If you use paper towels instead of 
	washable rags, you have identified yet another way to waste money.Identify ways you can save money. For example, combine trips. Or buy 
	econo size containers of things that keep for a while such as oats, beans, 
	and rice. Repeat the above for your city, county, state, and federal governments. Send 
your rep a short explanation of the bogus numbers, and state: The supply of money increased 83% in the two years ending August of 2023 
while at the same time the basket of goods and services shrank sharply as is 
evidenced by shortages everywhere. This means an inflation rate of over 100% in 
that time. We must do some belt-tightening, so please identify two ways the City 
(or whatever entity) wastes money and identify two ways the City can save money 
in addition to eliminating that waste. Then pursue it and let me know how I can 
help you make your case. Thanks! |  5. Security tip
| Some common ploys used by criminals and psychopaths: 
		An IRS agent disguised as a human being. Some of them are very 
		convincing. Don't be fooled.A con man pretending to be a doctor. A prime example is Anthony 
		Fauci, an ignorant little troll who is also a compulsive liar. His 
		deceptions are responsible for millions of deaths in the USA alone.A member of the House of Representatives claiming to represent you. 
		Since so few members of Congress actually represent their constituents 
		(it's estimated to be about 12 out of 435) rather than large 
		corporations (Big Pharma, Big Agra, etc.), you likely face this ploy.An idiot who is skilled at gaslighting and backbiting pretending to 
		be a manager, just because s/he fooled others into giving him/her 
		repeated promotions.And, of course, the oft-mentioned gas company man who comes to your 
		door asking to come in but he's not really with the gas company. The list of ploys is, of course, much longer. How do you identify the bad 
	actors and avoid becoming a victim? Some tips: 
		Look for inconsistencies. For example, nobody with a conscience 
		would become an IRS agent. A person who does that gives up his humanity 
		to become something else, something evil. Then there's the alleged gas 
		man whose "company vehicle" isn't parked in sight because it doesn't 
		have the utility's logo on the door because it's his own 15 year old 
		beater sedan. Also look for inconsistencies within what this person 
		tells you. This is probably your most powerful tool for detecting a con 
		artist or BS slinger.Look for implausibilities. As soon as Fauci said a dust mask 
		protects you from a biohazard, any credibility he had should have been 
		zero from that point forward.Follow the money. Who stands to profit?Look for competence. Not claims of competence, and not titles or 
		diplomas. Actual, demonstrated competence. Fauci, for example, bilked 
		the taxpayers for decades pretending he could lead a team to develop a 
		vaccine against HIV (this isn't possible, because of the rate of 
		evolution of HIV). He never did any original research and his "work" is 
		not cited in any medical publications.Sense the sweetness. Does this person give too many compliments or 
		in other ways act too positive? You can spot the idiot boss, by 
		observing the contrast between his buttkissing behavior toward the 
		higher-ups and the butt-kicking behavior toward his subordinates.Keep things real. Fat old men who fall for the idea that a 22 year 
		old hottie they "met" online would want to have a romantic relationship 
		with them are not being realistic. They send her $5,000 for some 
		"emergency" and they don't hear from her again. Actually, "she" is a fat 
		old man in Romania or somewhere simply conning the other fat old man. In essence, you need to be alert and aware. Rather than extending the 
		benefit of the doubt until some major proof (e.g., the "gas man" pulls 
		out a knife) something's amiss, look for what is out of place or simply 
		"off". Try to tell if it doesn't smell right. Look for behavior that is 
		too creepy, too cloying, or too harmonious (and thus manipulative). Look 
		for signs that it's scripted or insincere. If someone offers you 
		something for nothing (a common ploy of the socialists aka "Democrat 
		Party"), you are almost certainly a target of a con. If it sounds too 
		good to be true, well, you know the rest of that adage I am sure. Am I 
		saying you need to be paranoid and suspicious of everybody? All the 
		time? No, that would take the fun out of life. But so does being conned 
		out of large amounts of money or being conned into getting an injection 
		that has far more harm than benefit. Or simply having your time wasted 
		by a BS slinger when you could have been spending your time doing 
		something useful and fulfilling. So I guess what I am saying is to vet 
		people by being paranoid and suspicious until you get to know them by 
		observing how they behave under a variety of conditions and 
		circumstances. Showing initial trust is a good social skill, but having 
		initial trust is a poor security practice. Balance the two. |  |  |  
|  6. Health tip/Fitness tips
	
 |   
 | Statistics 
	when this photo was taken, 10 days before my 63rd birthday: 
	
	Height: 6'0"
	Wingspan: 6'1"
	Weight: 152.6 lbs, which is more than the 148.8lbs from the 
	2022 shoot. I am also leaner for this one (notice the striations in my left 
	pec).
	Bodyfat: Unknown, but well below what the Tanita scale says 
	is 5%
	Waist: 29
	Chest: 48
	Arms: 15
	Quads: 20.25
	Max bench press: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 10 reps with 150 lbs 
	to warm up on chest day
	Max squat: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 8 reps of front 
	squats with 90lbs to start Leg Day
	Cholesterol: In normal range, on low side
	Testosterone: Above the upper limit of the normal range
	Last illness: 1971
	Last workout missed: Spring of 1977
	Training days per week: 6
	Type of training: Split routine, heavy on supersets
	Meals per day: 7 on training days, 6 on rest day
	Number of eggs eaten per day: Between 7 and 10
	Percent of diet that is processed food: 0
	Amount of meat, wheat, corn, or soy eaten annually: 0
	Number of clot shots received: 0. ********* See 
	all of my climbing videos here:
	
	https://tinyurl.com/ClimbingSigChannel. Some cool climbing  videos: My hardest climb ever, a 5/11d on lead:
	https://youtu.be/UT5h0heUUBc . I 
	made a dumb mistake initially, letting the rope wrap over my shoulder. Watch 
	what happens.  The scale:  
		Beginner: 5.6. 5.7. 5.8, 5.9 Intermediate: 5.10a, b, c, d 5.11a, b, c, d Advanced: 5.12a, b, c, d 5.13a, b, c, d. Almost nobody climbs at this 
	level at any of the 5 local climbing gyms. |  
|  |  | A common strategy for reducing body fat is to "cut carbs". While this 
	appears to be effective, it's a flawed strategy. I will explain why, and 
	then outline a correct strategy. First, if by "cut carbs" the person means 
	to reduce highly processed foods such as pretzels, bagels, bread, cane 
	sugar, HFC, etc., those are things you should not be eating anyhow. I have 
	absolutely none of these in my diet. They serve no purpose, they damage your 
	health, and they are not satisfying. Going from having them in your diet to 
	not having them in your diet will of course result in lower body fat unless 
	they are replaced with an equal amount of other calories. It's also worth noting that "low fat", uh, "foods" are nearly always 
	heat-damaged foods that have had their fat replaced with sugar and/or 
	detergent. That's right, detergent. Fat is creamy and satisfying, if you 
	remove it from, say yogurt, you need to replace it with something that kind 
	of do a similar job. If you read the ingredients label and then look up each 
	ingredient, you will almost certainly find a surfactant (detergent) has been 
	added. Low fat dairy has the added "benefit" of being sterilized (robbed if 
	its digestion-aiding enzymes and other nutrients), so don't drink low fat 
	milk and don't eat low fat cottage cheese, yogurt, or cheese. Also, these 
	taste so bland and are so unsatisfying that a person consuming them almost 
	certainly is adding sugar somewhere. Why cutting carbs makes no sense The idea of "macronutrients" has been hyped up in the bodybuilding world. 
	It's a simple way to look at food. It's too simple. For one thing, no whole 
	food falls into the category of fat, carb, or protein (only highly processd 
	foods do). For example, what about a banana? Bodybuilders say it's a carb. Yet, it 
	has the same 20 amino acids that a steak does. And that would make it a 
	protein. What about an avocado? It's a great source of healthy fats, plus 
	like any other plant food it has the same 20 amino acids as any piece of 
	meat does. And it contains carbohydrates. Let's set this science aside for a moment and assume you actually can 
	divide foods up this way. Perhaps you identify the major micro and that 
	would make meat a protein and kale a carb (even though kale is high in 
	protein). So following the "low carb" path, you cut back on fruits and 
	vegetables. And oats, rice, and sweet potatoes. What happens as a result? 
	You don't have the fuel to truly push your workouts. That's major flaw 
	number one, because you reduce the adaptive response which, due to the 
	higher testosterone it provides, makes you leaner. So you cut carbs and get 
	both fatter and weaker. What is the normal response to this? Eat more protein! The problem here 
	is if you have a whole food diet (you ditched the highly processed junk), 
	you get plenty of protein in your diet already. Maybe all you need. Scarfing 
	down protein drinks to help make up for what is a carb deficiency means you 
	get excess protein. Your body cannot store protein. So your body breaks down 
	protein, and that process uses up at least some of the nitrogen you need to 
	build muscularity and vascularity. In addition to breaking the protein down 
	into amino acids (good), your body converts the excess into carbohydrates 
	which then get converted to fat and stored in the liver and other places. What to do instead You want to reduce total calories, not play games with macros. That said, 
	you will find the highest calorie density in fats. So we do play the macro 
	game just a little. Avocadoes, olive oil, and nuts are commonly eaten fats 
	in the body building world. Fats are twice as calorie dense as 
	carbohydrates. So reduce foods high in fat, but keep eating them because you 
	need the fat. But we don't focus on fats. Or any other macro. You can eat 
	smaller sweet potatoes rather than cutting them out (because they are "carbs"). 
	Definitely reduce the amount of protein supplementation you do. Am I advocating portion control? That is very hard for most people, 
	including me. So that's not what I aim for. Even though I meal prep and have 
	a lot of control over portion size during that process, I don't quite seem 
	to get the meals much smaller. That's partly because I use many different 
	ingredients. So what you do is eliminate an ingredient temporarily; that 
	will make the meal a little smaller and you won't really notice. For 
	example, during my leaning down phase I run out of avocadoes so a few meals 
	that normally get prepped with them don't get prepped with them. I like a 
	banana every afternoon. Even though it's only 90 calories, skipping a banana 
	every now and then helps me reduce overall calories. The same with skipping 
	a protein shake. You don't have to work hard at this or skip consistently to 
	see results in a reasonable time. All you're doing is snipping at the edges, 
	the way a sniper helps fight a guerilla war by taking out a few troops here 
	and there. What about skipping entire meals? That's a very bad idea. Eat all six. 
	Remember what I said about excess protein? If you spread your protein out 
	over six meals (or eight, as some ultra-athletes do), you have less to 
	absorb and any one time and therefore less to create uric acid and less to 
	convert to fat. Get your "carbs" because you need the energy. And also because the foods 
	classified this way have the highest nutrient density and you cannot be 
	healthy without them. |  |  
| 
 |  | At 
www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative 
articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to 
do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact: The best workouts are short and intense.A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction 
than the typical American diet.
 |  7. Factoid
| "Guns for criminals only" is a core belief among Democrats. It wasn't always 
this way. JFK, for example, was a member of the NRA. |   8. Thought for the DayNothing tastes as good as slim feels. Plenty of food that doesn't make you 
fat, sick, or stupid tastes quite good. So don't give in to eating something bad 
just because it tastes good.      Please forward this eNL to others. AuthorshipThe purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!). 
 The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by socialists or 
other brainwashed individuals. That's because those fools live in an alternate reality 
and have not bothered to learn the basics of how life works. They cannot do 
basic math, cannot apply logic, and cannot be bothered to learn the basic facts 
relevant to any topic that they are passionate about.
Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified. 
Where sources are not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort.
Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).
 
Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter. 
It is an act of service, almost no money is generated for me through this 
effort. Thank you for being a faithful reader.
Please pass this newsletter along to others. 
 |