In this issue:
Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness |
Factoid | Thought 4 the Day
|
|
Please forward this to others who might find
it useful. If you have a
social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link:
https://www.mindconnection.com
|
|
Please help me get a wider audience. Simply post a link to this
newsletter in the comments of any article you read online:
https://www.mindconnection.com/library/enlarchives/2022/enl2023-02-19.htm
1. Good News: Where the Intel is Good
Miscellaneous news
- International criminal and mass murderer Anthony "Quacktor" Fauci was
the highest paid USA federal employee despite being a felon (unconvicted in
court, but clearly guilty) at large. Now he's trying to get speaking
gigs. Blabber Buzz reported that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' rapid response
director Christina Pushaw put out a tweet on Sunday 05FEB that showed an
image of the Leading Motivational Speaker's Agency's website that listed
Fauci as a "motivational" and "healthcare" speaker with a price tag of
between $50,000 to $100,000 per speech that he gives.
Fauci has shown absolutely zero understanding of health care. Everything he
recommended during the height of Covidmania was the opposite of what you
should do. As for motivational, yes, he was able to motivate millions of
people to do silly things, stupid things, and harmful things.
Fauci should have been indicted years ago. Had he been indicted, millions of
lives would have been spared and millions more would not be coping with
"vaccine" injuries.
Libtards automatically, mindlessly propose "gun control" as the answer to
any kind of murder. Misuse of firearms is way down the list of murder
methods. So called "gun control" would not have stopped Fauci. What we need
is crime control.
- Watch the video of this amazing rescue:
https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1046569-not-all-heroes-wear-capes-teen-saves-elderly-man-and-his-dog-after-car-falls-through-icy-lake-video
- John "Watch me spew carbon with my private jet" Kerry has been forced to
sell his carbon-spewing jet. Kerry played a key role in the Paris Accord
psychodrama when he was Secretary of State under Soetoro (aka Obama). The
Paris Accord was a meeting in which delegates from various nations made
promises they had no intention of keeping, a real dog and pony show. Despite
that, the USA met its Paris Accord targets shortly after President Trump's
energy policies took effect. After the coup, the Retard in Chief negated
those policies and the USA is once again far off from meeting those targets.
Defending against socialism
- AOC has been humiliated multiple times this year. She is no longer the
smug little Communist she has portrayed herself as being.
- Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, a Jew-hating, America-hating communist seems to
have lost her support from the America-hating communist lamestream media.
She's just made too many over the top remarks. She will probably be the next
of "The Squad" to be booted out of Congress.
- Comrade Diane Feinstein, who has abused her office since she entered it
at age 59 in 1991, has announced she won't seek re-election in 2024. So she
would leave office in early 2025, at age 91. Violent criminals and repeat
offenders will miss their champion, someone who fought relentlessly for
safer working conditions for those who choose a career of robbing, raping,
and mugging. We worthless law-abiding citizens, however, have reason to
celebrate. Just call us selfish.
The ongoing Covid scam
- The Swiss President and the Minister of Health are under investigation,
indictment, and prosecution by the Attorney General for Covid Crimes
involving lying about the vaccine effectiveness and safety. Thailand is
convening war crime tribunals to nullify Pfizer contracts. See video below.
- I walked into a bank recently and quipped, "I saw a guy walk out with a
mask on. I wasn't sure if he had just robbed the place." There is no medical
reason for people to be wearing dust masks out in public. Nobody should be
allowed to walk into a bank with one on. I told this to the teller, who of
course does not make policy. But I will be writing to various banks and
telling them they need to stop allowing the mental illness of the few put
the many at risk. If you want to go into a bank, show your face. Otherwise,
use the drive-up or ATM.
- As of this month, the federal government has blown $30 billion on the
spike protein stimulation shots (aka, "the clot shot"). There's no
documented benefit of these shots (e.g., protecting people from Covid), but
the death toll is well-documented. So its its chilling effect on birth rates
among the jabbed. Ergo, it's a population control measure. The federal
government could have "population-reduced" (killed) the same number of
people by simply releasing 200 convicted murderers from prison at a net
savings of $7.2 million per year incarceration costs and zero expenditure.
Why they chose the vastly more expensive method is explained by the fact
that Big Pharma lobbies for depopulation privileges while while street thugs
don't.
More (including videos):
|
2. Product Highlight
The Rocket Pen is a life-changer for students and adults with reading
difficulties. Scan words or lines from any screen (e.g., tablet, smart phone,
computer) or printed material, and it not only reads to you but provides word
definitions, word breakdown, and more to teach you to read (by "you" we mean the
person you buy this for). The Rocket Pen Reader gives the reading-challenged
their independence,
Buy the Rocket Pen on Amazon
| eBay |
Walmart
Watch this demo video:
https://youtu.be/DQd4MBpv4B8
Main features and benefits:
- Allows students or adults with reading difficulties to gain independence
and reading fluency without stigma.
- Reading tutor functions include spelling, syllabication (how the word is
"built"), and one word displayed in big font.
- Syllables break for each word.
- Direct lookup of phrasal verbs and idiomatic expressions (for example,
get ahead, get along, keep on, keep off, look forward to).
- Uses colors for the different fields, to improve the understanding of
the dictionary definition.
- You scan, it reads to you.
- Scans lines of text or individual words from almost any surface, not
just paper. It can read the text on a computer, tablet, or phone.
- Hear individual words or even multiple lines of text read aloud in natural voice.
- Completely self-contained, no computer or Wi-Fi required.
- Comes ready to use, no setup process (but customization can easily be
done).
- Full 1.9 inch color touch screen, and simple physical buttons for
screenless scan and read.
- Multiple built-in dictionaries to search definitions including the New
Oxford American Dictionary with Oxford Thesaurus of English (Americanized),
Oxford American Children’s Dictionary with Oxford American Children’s
Thesaurus, and English to Spanish dictionary.
- Built-in speaker automatically mutes when earbuds are used,
automatically unmutes when they aren't.
- Meets FCC, ROHS, and CE standards.
- Package includes ReaderPen, USB charging cable, Quick Start Guide, and
earphones.
|
|
The Rocket Pen Reader is an affordable, powerful reading assistant and reading
tutor that erases the barriers created by dyslexia and other reading problems.
It can be used privately in the classroom, avoiding stigma, thanks to the
earbuds included in the kit (it can alternatively be used without earbuds).
How it teaches reading
Before the early 1980s, public schools relied on phonics to teach reading.
This allowed any student to "sound out" a new, unfamiliar word and also
recognize its root and thereby often grasp its meaning even without a
dictionary. Then schools switched to the "Look See" method, which treated words
as individual pictograms to memorize. The results were dismal, plummeting the
USA from the top of the literacy ranks to the bottom among industrialized
countries.
The Rocket Pen puts phonics back in.
It also adds a context-driven dictionary and a context-driven thesaurus, both
powerful tools for improving reading skills. See the reading tutor functions in
the chart below.
It is the answer
The Rocket Pen Reader is the answer for helping the reading-challenged in the
classroom, special needs classes, home-schooling, and adult education. Because
of its mobile-friendly design, you can carry it with you and use it anywhere.
Not only does it read to you, it helps you learn to read (for example, by
showing you the syllable breakdown and the definition). It is super easy to use,
no need to watch a dozen videos to figure out what to do.
Based on the highly
successful ReadingPen 2 and vastly superior to the cPen Reader Pen, the
RocketPen is the latest generation in a reading tutor scanning pen. It is a
quantum leap or two beyond anything else on the market. This amazing device
retails for $499, sells for $399 on Amazon and Walmart.com, but is on sale
now for a limited time only via our eBay store at only $379!
It beats the competition
Compare the Rocket Pen to the competition. The winner here is obvious:
|
Rocket Pen |
cPen Reader |
Orcam Read |
Amazon Price |
399 |
285 |
1990 |
Color touchscreen |
Yes |
No |
No |
Words appear in large font |
Yes |
No |
No |
Scans phones, tablets, etc. |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Scans blocks of text |
No |
No |
Yes |
Color-coded dictionary |
Yes |
No |
No |
Simple physical buttons |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Ergonomic for kids |
Yes |
No |
No |
English and Spanish |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Verbal commands |
No |
No |
Yes |
Auto trigger upon contact |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Easy menu navigation |
Yes |
No |
No |
Manufacturer experience, yrs |
30 |
7 |
4 |
Product age |
Latest generation! |
7 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Reading Tutor Functions |
|
|
|
Dictionary 1 |
New Oxford American |
Oxford Primary |
n/a |
Dictionary 2 |
Oxford American Children’s |
n/a |
n/a |
Thesaurus 1 |
New Oxford American |
Oxford Primary |
n/a |
Thesaurus 2 |
Oxford American Children’s |
n/a |
n/a |
Syllablication / word breakdown |
Yes |
No |
No |
Hear word spelled out |
Yes |
No |
No |
See word spelled out |
Yes |
No |
No |
Part of speech |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Headword |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Pronunciation guide |
Yes |
No |
No |
Idioms |
Yes |
No |
No |
Quick Define feature |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
3. Brainpower tip
Take the time to think things through. The normal approach is to go with the
first idea, conclusion, or solution that comes to mind. And then filter out
anything that doesn't fit what you decided or came up with. Anytime I build
something, I come up with an initial concept. It seems good enough. But instead
of going with the initial concept, I play with it in my mind. Some examples:
- When I built my climbing wall, there were no YouTube videos or other
resources on doing such a thing. During the Covid shutdown, it was OK to go
to a liquor store but not to a gym. So many climbers began building walls. I
have since seen many YouTube videos. And not a single design is as elegant
or as functional as mine. I went from a concept of using extra long fence
posts to building an adjustable steel gimbal.
- I wanted to put a cat door in a window without making holes in glass. My
initial concept was to make a panel that would fit in the space created by
opening the window. This worked well for many years, except the window could
not be operated and there was a lot of air leakage. Last year, I went into
deep thinking mode on this problem. I built something with a higher R value
than the wall it went into, and it has many thoughtful touches such as a
built-in step-off shelf. I built it slowly, also, taking the time to measure
thrice and cut once. The workmanship is all aces.
- In my late teens, I wanted a fast street car. My original concept was to
drop a big engine into an old car; this would be affordable. But it wasn't
very satisfying. I thought and thought and thought on this, and did a lot of
research. I ended up working under more than one mentor to build an insanely
quick street car. It ran 12 second quarter miles in street tires, far faster
than any production car. It wasn't cheap, but it was quite an
accomplishment.
Of course, this "think things through" gives you advantages in areas other
than in building things. When the Covid scam first launched, I held the CDC in
high regard. But then they started saying stupid things like a dust mask would
stop a virus and people should stand 6 feet apart. Rather than stick with my
original viewpoint that the CDC should be listened to, I allowed new information
to inform me otherwise. So when these and other fools started yammering about
the spike protein jab and deceptively calling it a vaccine I was already
prepared mentally to think instead of accept.
I carry this practice through to other areas of my life as well. Not as
consistently as I would like to, because there is only so much time in a day.
The thing is, though, you can save huge amounts of time by thinking things
through versus dealing with the consequences of going with your first or second
idea. |
4. Finance tip
When I worked in manufacturing, the concept of "revenue per square foot" held
great prominence. Those square feet aren't free. That concept still holds great
prominence today, and not just in manufacturing. It applies to almost any
industrial or commercial building, and it applies to residential buildings where
a leasing or rental arrangement exists. At one plant where I was the Plant
Electrical Engineer and Electrical Maintenance Manager, the hourly revenue from
six lines was $750,000. Did we keep every conceivable spare part to keep
downtime to a minimum? No, it costs floor space to do that. So instead of having
only five lines producing (significantly less) revenue, that math worked out
such that losing $125,000 an hour for a few hours once in a great while made
more sense than permanently losing $125,000 an hour by using productive space to
store spare parts. Read that again. Let it sink in. That's the mindset to take
when evaluating how you use the space in your home. Filling it with "just in
case" is not cost-effective.
Many people who "own" a home (that is, people who pay for a mortgage, pay
"rent" to the county in the form of property taxes, pay for all maintenance and
repairs, etc.) fail to apply this concept. For some, the cost per square foot of
actual living space is breathtakingly high because so much of their house is
filled with unnecessary items. At the far end of this spectrum, such people
would be financially better off to rent a commercial storage space that they can
fill with clutter, junk, old stuff, duplicate stuff, and unused items and then
rent a one-bedroom flat with a kitchenette; the savings would be about $5,000
per year or about the price of a new car every five years.
How can you calculate the cost per square foot of your living space?
First, develop the cost figure.
- Add up all the costs involved in "owning" your home for 40 years. This
would include your mortgage, whether paid off or not because a mortgage
leaves a financial print due to lost opportunity costs and other factors.
Insurance, property taxes, maintenance, repairs, new roof every 25 years,
new windows every 20 years, and so on. You'll have to do some estimating,
and you'll need to account for every shelter-related cost that you didn't
pay when you were 10 years old and living with your parents. I picked 40
years because it seems more doable than a longer timeframe and also fairly
typical. But you can choose a different timeframe if doing so works better
for you.
- Divide the total by 40 years (or whatever your timeframe number is).
This gives you your annual cost for the total square footage of your house.
Call this ACTSF.
A figure of $6,000/year is about normal for a median-value house in a
medium-sized midwestern city. If you are much above or below that, you don't
have a median-value house, your zip code is expensive, your expenses are
outliers, or you made a mistake. But you could have $12,000/year and it could be
correct for you; do the math again to confirm.
Second, figure out how much space you are using versus wasting on storage.
- Measure all the space used for anything other than living space. This
includes closets used for anything other than clothes and linens,
bookshelves, free-standing cabinets, and any stacks of anything. You must
also include any counter space that is occupied rather than bare. Exclude
furniture that is used for living purposes (e.g., living room couch, bed,
dining table) but include furniture used or misused to store things. Any duplicated major appliances also get included (for
example, you have a freezer in addition to a freezer/refrigerator). Add up
all the measurements and name the total "Storage Space".
- Measure all the space used for living space. This includes all empty
space, furniture used for living and entertainment purposes, a linen closet,
and one clothes closet per occupant. Add up all the measurements and name
the total "Living Space".
- If you are like most people, Storage Space + Living Space > Total Square
Footage. That's because most people misperceive how their space is actually
used. Go back and reconcile errors, being brutally honest.
A figure of 1000 square feet of living space is about normal for a
median-sized house. A hoarder will typically have less than 100
square feet, while a minimalist could be pushing 95% of the total square feet due to
basically not owning anything. Most of
us need some storage, so we balance living space and storage but heavily in
favor of living space.
Third, divide the ACTSF by Living Space. This is how much you pay for
each square foot of storage. As living space increases, the cost of storage goes
down because less of the cost of the place is allocated to storage.
A figure of $6 per square foot is about normal. A hoarder will
typically be paying $60 per square foot per year to store things while being
subjected to high levels of stress-inducing visual noise and being unable to use
the place as an actual home (a place to relax and entertain).
Cost-saving solution
By contrast to the $60 per square foot per year to misuse your house as a
storage facility (which it surely is not zoned for or insured for, and for which
it does not meet the appropriate fire codes), U-Haul has 600 square foot storage
units available for around $60 per month (price varies by city). That's $10 per
square foot times 12 months or $120 per square foot per year. At first glance,
it appears it's cheaper to misuse your house as a storage facility than to store
all that junk in a U-Haul unit. But because the unit allows for greater height
and density (no need for pathways), the typical hoarder can recoup the same
square footage as is available TOTAL in a median-sized house. It's like getting
an entire house for $720 per year.
For most people who just have some overloaded closets and a packed garage,
they could use a smaller unit at $30 per month to significantly increase their
available living space. Or they could toss that extra stuff and save $360 per
year while enjoying as much additional space as a major addition project would
have provided.
That's the math. It's pretty simple.
An even cheaper option
...is to just get rid of stuff. People with far too much stuff try to
do this over time. They fail. Here is an approach that works:
- Rent a dumpster.
- Fill it up.
You just keep discarding items, regardless or their condition or value, until
they are no longer in your house. Saving a $5 item but paying $12 for the space
to store it is foolish. Filling up a dumpster may seem like an impossible task,
what can actually be tossed out? Look for anything duplicate. You don't need
duplicates of things, generally. Even ink pens, you don't need more than two
total in your entire house. One to use, and one to replace it when it runs dry
(I buy pens one at a time). Did you buy a new coffeemaker? Toss out the old one.
Do you have four 10-inch fry pans but never use more than one at a time? Toss
out the other three. Don't sort for giving to charity, that will just add
another layer of work. Toss. It. Out. You want quick results and you don't want
to lose your momentum.
Consider this example. Suppose you have a 3,000 square foot home that has
only 1,000 square feet of living space in it. You toss out half the clutter and
junk, and now you've got 2,000 square feet. That is the same thing as paying
$500,000 for a second 3,000 square foot home equally filled with clutter and
junk. By tossing that clutter and junk out, you gain $500,000 worth of space for
free. The total value of the clutter and junk isn't $500,000. It's probably less
than $5,000. When I was a kid, my parents took my sister and me to "Margaret and
Ray's place". Their house was filled with useless junk, mostly broken things.
The total value was $50 at most. They had added on to their house several times.
But they always filled the new space with junk. Those were expensive add-ons!
If the living space recovery project is beyond your ability to carry out,
don't feel bad. Just hire a professional firm to handle this for you. Remember,
it's about recovering expensive square footage. If a decluttering firm charges
you $2500 for day of recovering living space, that's cheap compared to what you
paid in the last year to store things you don't use and don't need.
Definitely worth doing
While inflation is the single biggest cost for the typical American, the cost
per square foot of living space is not to be ignored. Saving money there has
many benefits. And if you get the cost low enough, you may decide to downsize to
fewer square feet for an overall reduction in total outlay per year. If you can
live in a 3,000 square foot house mostly filled with junk, you can easily live
in a 1,500 square foot house that is decluttered and junk-free. The savings in
property taxes, insurance, and maintenance are significant. Plus, the smaller
house is easier to clean. And the bigger house, filled with junk, is impossible
to get to a state that can honestly be called "clean". Plastic bins emit toxic
fumes, and cardboard boxes harbor paper worms and other critters. These items
also create "impossible to clean" areas under, behind, and between them.
For those who keep junk due to the fear of not having something they might need,
I say this. You need to be more fearful of how your junk inhibits first
responders in the event of an emergency. A person can walk through any part of
my house in total darkness and not step on anything, stumble over stuff, etc. At
most, a person would bump into a large piece of furniture (and there is no
furniture in the normal walkways). This doesn't mean I just moved the mess to
the garage, either. I liken my garage to an operating room, because it's so
neat. The back wall is lined with rollaway toolboxes and cabinets. There's not a
single box of anything on my floor. It's very functional, so when I need to do a
build or repair project I don't have to precede that with a cleaning project. |
5. Security tip
Door cameras are all the rage, today. They really do help secure your
property. The one downside is that if you've grown accustomed to setting
your trash out in Amazon boxes so some idiot would steal them off your
porch, you'll now have to put your trash out in bins emptied by a garbage
company. While security is important for your property, what do you do for
the security of your mind?
Do you know what what happens when genius level people neglect to
consider this? They exhibit IQs below zero. Here is a recent example of
that:
Mensa survey question was:
What type of content would you like to see more of in The Mensa
Bulletin? If you do not have a response, please leave it blank and
continue to the next question.
My answer:
More articles about critical thinking. I was aghast that so many Mensans
believed the BS about wearing masks (3rd grade math destroys the
narrative) and that so many believed that somehow a "vaccine" stops
transmission (there is no mechanism) and further that a shot which
induces you to produce a toxin (spike protein) instead of antigens is
somehow a "vaccine". This is shameful for an organization titled "The
High IQ Society". Boy, did that amygdala take over and cut the cortex
completely out of things! Reason, not ignorant fear, should have been
our guide.
Mind theft is a constant danger, and you must guard against it. Here are
some tips:
- Zero television, or at least very, very picky about what you watch.
- Zero news, from any source (Epoch Times being the one exception, but
even then trust but verify!).
- Limit exposure to libtards. Don't engage them in their "debates",
indoctrination, or anything else they are spewing.
- Don't discuss "news" items with other people. The news-infected are
like zombies, and all they want to do is spread the disease.
- Actively seek out and interact with people who think. You will have
to be very active in finding them, because the portion thinkers in our
population is shrinking.
- Engage in conversations with people who think, realizing that fact
means ya'll won't agree on everything.
On the physical front, protect your brain with:
- Zero processed sugar in your diet (it destroys neurons).
- Zero wheat, corn, or soy in your diet (it's contaminated with
glyphosate, which is a powerful neurotoxin).
- Zero seed oils in your diet. These cause mechanical damage in the
brain. One day the medical establishment will acknowledge this and
declare they have found the cause of Alzheimer's. They are slow on the
uptake, so just know that you know and they don't.
Remember, sugar destroys neurons but television makes morons. Protect
your mind by avoiding both. |
|
6. Health tip/Fitness tips
|
The photos tell you something important about my credibility in this area. Statistics
when these photos were taken, 2 days past my 62nd birthday:
-
Height: 6'0"
-
Wingspan: 6'1"
-
Weight: 148.8lbs (a bit more than the Age 60 shoot, and I am
leaner for this one)
-
Bodyfat: Unknown, but well below what the Tanita scale says
is 5%
-
Waist: 29
-
Chest: 48
-
Arms: 15
-
Quads: 20.5 (an increase of half an inch since the Age 60
shoot)
-
Max bench press: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 10 reps with 150 lbs
to warm up on chest day
-
Max squat: Unknown, but I do 4 sets of 8 reps of front
squats with 90lbs to start Leg Day
-
Cholesterol: In normal range, on low side
-
Testosterone: Above the upper limit of the normal range
-
Last illness: 1971
-
Last workout missed: Spring of 1977
-
Training days per week: 6
-
Type of training: Split routine, heavy on supersets
-
Meals per day: 7 on training days, 6 on rest day
-
Percent of diet that is processed food: 0
-
Amount of meat, wheat, corn, or soy eaten annually: 0
-
Number of eggs eaten per day: Between 8 and 10
Some cool climbing videos:
See
all of my climbing videos here:
https://tinyurl.com/ClimbingSigChannel |
|
Once in a while, I buy a book on climbing. Such books inevitably have a
chapter or section on physical training. The people writing these books may
understand climbing, but I have yet to find that any of the authors
understand physical training. I read the same tropes I was told (and,
unfortunately, believed for a while) in my early years of martial arts
training. These people are told something, and they accept it as true. Then
they repeat it without bothering to learn the basics of the subject. In
the latest book of my growing collection, the author said to avoid getting
"too much muscle" because "too much muscle will impede your range of
motion". Let's examine this and then look at the correct viewpoint. First,
some obvious questions.
- At no point did the author even attempt to define "too much muscle".
This tells you he has no idea what this means. How much muscle is "too
much muscle" and what is your risk of gaining "too much muscle"?
- Exactly by what mechanism does "too much muscle" impede your range
of motion?
- What type of training will result in "too much muscle"?
- Which champion MMA fighters, all of whom are significantly muscular,
suffer from limited range of motion? Isn't the number exactly zero?
- Why is it that in the past few Mr. Olympia contests, the posing
routines exhibit range of motion that many yoga students would envy?
Robert Wichman, a drug-free bodybuilder based in Lees Summit, MO, has
regularly competed in the drug-free division of the Mr. Olympia where he
is a Gold Medalist. He's got very big muscles. And his range of motion
is in the "superior" range. If you train with Wichman, you'd better be
prepared to hear him bark out, "Full range of motion!" as you work out.
He is totally adamant about this. When you train with the full range of
motion, several benefits accrue:
- The muscle takes its natural shape, which enhances the symmetry
that bodybuilders are after.
- You prevent muscle tightness, tendon strain, and ligament
problems.
- You can't possibly train this way and use a weight in excess of
what is appropriate. That is, someone doing a half rep of biceps
curl might use a 50lb dumbbell and create ligament tears. Someone
doing a full rep would need to use half that weight and have a
strong mind-muscle connection during the lower 15% and upper 15% of
the range of motion.
- You can get a better pump because you can squeeze hard at the
limits of the range of motion.
So what is too much muscle? And if there is such a thing, what is
your risk and how do you reduce the risk?
- The body always seeks to be as efficient as possible with
calorie-consuming tissue. It will produce only as much
hypertrophy as necessary to meet the loads it encounters. Your
endocrine system and other limiters don't permit massive gains
in the short-term. Those gains recede without continued stimulus
to signal the body to keep them.
- You have seen those super-lumpy physiques with grotesque
musculature. Aren't those folks walking around with too much
muscle? Yes, because they use limited range of motion training
so they can handle excessive weight in one part of the range of
motion and cause the muscle belly to swell. They are nearly
always also using anabolic steroids.
- To eliminate, not merely reduce, the risk of "too much
muscle" (muscle that is overdeveloped in a portion of the range
of motion), don't take anabolic steroids, perform each rep
through the full range of motion (or use a multi-exercise
approach to achieve the same thing), and make large compound
movements the basis of your workouts.
For 90% of the drug-free training population, there is zero
risk of gaining so much muscle that you have difficulty making
graceful, athletic movements. It's not "too much" muscle gained,
but "too little" range trained. What about the other 10% of the
drug-free training population? Well, the same thing. And if you
add 10% to 90%, you get 100%. That is, there is no human being
on earth whose athletic performance will suffer due to gaining
too much muscle unless that person turns to drugs to override
the body's built-in control systems. Another question is how
much "range of motion" are we talking about? Among climbers, I
am probably in the upper 2% for flexibility and range of motion.
That is, the very same people who say my training methods impede
range of motion have less range of motion than I do. If they
would discard the "too much muscle" theory and construct proper
workouts, they would have more range of motion and more power
throughout that range. I know several climbers who have adopted
this philosophy, have excellent hypertrophy, and combine their
strength near the limit of range with dynamic movement to do
things I'm not able to do. A takeaway for me here is the limit
isn't too much muscle but too little technique ability. Train
hard, and don't worry that your results might somehow be so
spectacular that you'll need to dial back the training. The real
danger is in letting this false concept hold you back from
training to achieve your full potential. It does provide an
excuse for training only once or twice a week ("Yeah, I might
shoot past Ronnie Coleman and not be able to do the splits even
though I have never been able to do them in the first place"),
but it's only that. An excuse. And a lame one at that. |
|
|
At
www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative
articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to
do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact:- The best workouts are short and intense.
- A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction
than the typical American diet.
|
7. Factoid
Many people consider "carbs" to be so fattening they won't eat fruit or root
vegetables. A large banana is only 90 calories, an apple only 60. A medium (5" x
2") sweet potato, only 100. |
8. Thought for the Day
Many people consider themselves virtuous by dint of membership in some group,
but then treat others quite badly. Libtards are a primary example of this, with
all their bullying, cancelling, and hyberbolic name-calling of normal people.
Answer for yourself, "What is virtue, really?" and you have answered an
important question.
Please forward this eNL to others.
Authorship
The purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!).
The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by socialists or
other brainwashed individuals. That's because those fools live in an alternate reality
and have not bothered to learn the basics of how life works. They cannot do
basic math, cannot apply logic, and cannot be bothered to learn the basic facts
relevant to any topic that they are passionate about.
Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified.
Where sources are not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort.
Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).
Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter.
It is an act of service, almost no money is generated for me through this
effort. Thank you for being a faithful reader.
Please pass this newsletter along to others.
|