Soft drinks: Unsafe Beverages
See all health articles
|We would also like to thank Dr. Mercola, at
www.mercola.com for helping to get this
article out in front of people.|
Lamendola, health and fitness expert (see my photos below)
Amazingly, Americans (and people in other countries) actually drink a product that can rightfully be called Osteoporosis In a Can. And, it gets worse from there. Read on.
This poison goes by many brand names, such as Coca Cola and Pepsi. Generically, this poison is on the market in formulations known as soda, pop, and soft drinks. It includes all carbonated beverages--even carbonated
plain water. The various substances in sodas compound the problem, especially the typical formulations with their carbonic acid or phosphoric
Reading the rest of this article may be the best use you've ever made of 5 minutes. Yeah, we know Pepsi will never sponsor an ad on this site. But your health is more important to us.
It's tragic that the "beverage" industry shoves this toxic brew at human beings. Let's take a closer look at what it does.
The carbonation in all soft drinks causes calcium loss in the bones through a three-stage process:
- The carbonation irritates the stomach.
- The stomach "cures" the irritation the only way
it knows how. It adds the only antacid at its disposal: calcium. It gets
this from the blood.
- The blood, now low on calcium, replenishes its
supply from the bones. If it did not do this, muscular and brain
function would be severely impaired.
But, the story doesn't end there. Another problem with most soft drinks is they also contain phosphoric acid (not the same as the carbonation, which is carbon dioxide mixed with the water). This substance also causes a drawdown on the store of calcium.
So, soft drinks soften your bones (actually, they
make them weak and brittle) in three ways:
- Carbonation reduces the calcium in the bones.
- Phosphoric acid reduces the calcium in the bones.
- The beverage replaces a calcium-containing
alternative, such as milk or water. Milk and water are not excellent
calcium sources, but they are sources.
Diabetes in a can
The picture gets worse when you add sugar to the soft
drink. The sugar, dissolved in liquid, is quickly carried to the
bloodstream, where its presence in overload quantities signals the pancreas
to go into overdrive. The pancreas has no way of knowing if this sugar
inrush is a single dose or the front-end of a sustained dose. The assumption
in the body's chemical controls is the worst-case scenario. To prevent nerve
damage from oxidation, the pancreas pumps out as much insulin as it can.
Even so, it may not prevent nerve damage.
But, this heroic effort of the pancreas has a hefty downside. The jolt of insulin causes the body to reduce the testosterone in the bloodstream, and to depress further production of it. In both men
and women, testosterone is the hormone that controls the depositing of
calcium in the bones. You can raise testosterone through weight-bearing
exercise, but if you are chemically depressing it via massive sugar
intake (it takes very small quantities of sugar to constitute a massive
intake, because refined sugar is not something the human body is
equipped to handle), then your body won't add calcium to the bones.
Add this to what we discussed above, and you can see that drinking sweetened colas is a suicidal endeavor. And now you know why bone damage formerly apparent only in the very old is now showing up in teenagers.
Cancer in a can
In the spring of 2005, research showed a strong
correlation between esophageal cancer and the drinking of carbonated
beverages. We aren't providing extensive detail here yet, because the
subject is still rolling through the medical community. Basically, it works
- You drink soda.
- It makes you burp (acid reflux, actually).
- The burping carries acid into the esophagus, causing lesions.
- The lesions become cancerous.
So, maybe it's not so bad if you sip sodas instead of
guzzle them. By the time this issue settles out through double blind studies
(rather than statistical analysis only), that is probably what researchers
will conclude. It's common sense.
Of course, the softdrink companies have conducted
their own flawed studies using flawed methods to obtain the flawed results
they want. This way, they can deny that their toxic products also cause
esophageal cancer in addition to other diseases their beverages cause. I
wonder if these folks have flawed sleep at night, or if they are just
Do a Yahoo or Google search on softdrinks + esophageal
cancer, and you'll get several thousand pages of results. Most of the
articles say softdrinks "may" cause esophageal cancer. And that's true--in
the sense that lying down on a railroad track "may" get you run over by a
train or holding a revolver with one bullet in it and pulling the trigger
"may" blow your brains out. It's a game of chance. How many chances do you
want to take?
|You can search online for data on the number of esophageal cancer cases per year and the startling increase in this cancer occurring with the huge ramp-up in soft drink consumption. This disease was unheard of
two generations ago--now, it's common. You can also search for the source reports and articles. But, that's not really
necessary because basic science is at work here:|
- Mechanical damage to cells is a huge
risk factor for cancer. It's why asbestos particles, for
example, cause lung cancer.
- Soft drinks cause acid reflux (stomach acid rising up past the esophageal valve). This is
more pronounced when the body is horizontal (as in sleeping), but the sheer volume of soft drinks consumed in
the USA means the acid reflux is well past the danger point. Any time you ingest a gassy drink, you are going to get
belching--and acid into the esophagus. How much is too much? The research doesn't say where the limit is--it only shows
that most Americans are far, far, far past it.
- Stomach acid dissolves tissue--that's
its purpose. The stomach lining does not extend into the
esophagus, so the lower esophagus gets damaged by acid far
more frequently in soft drink users than in non soft drink
users. This results in a radical increase in cell mutations,
along with a far higher level of free radicals.
This isn't an attack on the Coca-Cola or
Pepsi corporations. It's a revealing of the truth about all
carbonated beverages. This has been widely reported in many
Remember, soft drinks kill.
Stop doing acid!
Reader Jim Faulkner contributed the following to this article:
Refer to "The pH Miracle", Balance Your Diet,
Reclaim Your Health, written by Robert O Young, PhD and Shelley Redford
Young (copyright 2002 by Robert Young, PhD, published by Warner Books
We all know that our average body temperature is
about 98.6 degrees F., but how many of us know our normal pH (Power of
Hydrogen scale which measures Hydrogen from 0 to 14)? A rating of 7 is
neutral. Healthy human bodies should be slightly alkaline at 7.365.
Whenever your body moves away from 7.365, your system takes action to
move you back to that value.
Water in most areas has a value of 7 or neutral.
Carbonated drinks have a value of about 2.8, but the difference isn't
just 4.2. The pH scale values vary exponentially. As the scale moves
from 7 to 6, the difference is multiplied by 10. Food or beverage at 6
is 10 times as acidic as that at 7. So that carbonated beverage is
approaching 100,000 times more acidic than water. With this information,
the osteoporosis condition takes on greater LIGHT.
Ron Howell, a senior vice president at New Vision
Inc elaborates on these ideas in "New Vision News Magazine" Vol 1 -issue
4 2002 in introducing new products that improve pH.
My wife Jan is a Diamond Independent Distributor
with New Vision. She is 71 (married 50 years, May 2003). I read
everything they send to her. We have both done the Bill Phillips "Body
For Life" program since my 69th birthday, and we ballroom dance three
nights a week. Neither of us take any pharmaceutical drugs. Life is
Kindest regards, Jim Faulkner
Let's compare soft drinks to water:
1. The salt in these "beverages" may reduce the amount
of water in your cells. Salt increases dehydration, which is why sailors
don't drink seawater.
1. The National Institute of Health reports that 75% of
Americans are chronically dehydrated. However, this figure is likely
In 37% of Americans, the
thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often mistaken for hunger.
Even mild dehydration will slow down your
metabolism, speed up aging, reduce resistance to disease, and reduce
muscle recovery after exercise.
2. The sugar in these "beverages" (other than the diet
kind) increases hunger.
2. One glass of water shut down midnight hunger pangs
for almost 100% of the dieters studied in a University of Washington
3. All sodas promote the symptoms shown in the box at
right. The insulin response from the sugary versions compounds them.
3. Lack of water is a major trigger of daytime fatigue,
mid-day munchies, leg and toe cramps, and inability to mentally focus.|
4. The obesity and nutritional deficiencies typically
suffered by heavy soda drinkers bring on back and joint pain.
4. Research indicates drinking half a gallon of water a
day would significantly ease back and joint pain for 80% of sufferers.|
5. Sodas cause the body to lose water, thereby
promoting the symptoms shown at right.
5. A 2% drop in the amount of water retained in the
body (other than as subcutaneous or intercellular water due to excess
sodium) can trigger fuzzy short-term memory, trouble with basic math,
and difficulty focusing on printed or video text.|
6. The various colorings and other substances in sodas
aren't noted for cancer prevention.
6. The NIH says drinking a quart of water daily reduces
the risk of colon cancer by 45%, reduces the risk of breast cancer by
79%, reduces the risk of bladder cancer by 50%.|
|The author talks about his credentials:
Here's how my aversion to softdrinks got started. Wa-a-ay back in the late
1960s (when I was in grade school), I put 2 + 2 together (that
is, carbonation and calcium carbonate) and concluded that
drinking soft drinks would cause the loss of calcium in the
bones. I was delighted to read in such august publications as
the American Journal of Nursing in the mid-1980s that the AMA
publicly reached this same conclusion. Note here that I'm not
telling you about any false conclusions I also reached.... :)
You are probably used to reading articles that have a fair number of
references in the backnotes. I realize that the medical
establishment looks for peer-reviewed references (so do the
engineering and management professions, which is where my formal
training lies). That is one way to filter information, and it is
certainly helpful. But it isn't perfect.
On the other hand, the Internet is full of articles that are poorly researched, riddled with errors, and written by crackpots. It sometimes is hard to tell if someone is just an idiot writing opinion or a knowledgeable person writing something that can be validated by experts.
of credentials requires a bit of an open mind, and I think you
have that. I haven't taken any medical classes. My undergraduate
is in electrical engineering, and I have an MBA. No medical
training. Now, here's where it gets interesting...
My gamma globulin is well below the "acceptable" limit. It's been that way my whole life. I was always sick when I was little. But I have not been sick even one day, since 1971. This has amazed
every doctor who has seen my blood work and medical history side
by side. Asking me how to stay well is like asking Tiger Woods
how to play golf. There are some other "markers" along these
lines, but this gamma globulin one makes the point.
My expertise here has come the old-fashioned way: reading absurd amounts
of authoritative materials. I have pored over thousands of books
and articles on health (at one time, I had library cards for 5
different library systems and used all of them regularly). Due
to my personal condition, I have been conducting this research now for about four decades.
You can find
many of my articles, plus a fairly recent photo of me at
The scientific method requires using a control group. The "credentials" I gave don't comply with that and are thus
anecdotal. But I think they are compelling nonetheless.
We've had a fair number of people write to us, asking for sources. For this topic, "sources" are not necessary:
- The fact that calcium combines with carbon to create calcium
carbonate is basic chemistry.
- The fact that carbon is in carbon dioxide is also basic
- I figured out the calcium depletion from carbonated
beverages at the age of 8; I remember because I spoke up in
class about this and that led to a parent teacher conference.