In this issue:
Good News | Product Highlight | Brainpower | Finances | Security | Health/Fitness |
Factoid | Thought 4 the Day
Please forward this to others who might find
it useful. If you have a
social media acct (Facebook, etc.), please add our link:
1. Good News
Advances in technology continue to frustrate the Obama agenda. Some examples:
Materials technology. Nova produced a documentary on this; check it out
from your local library. Researchers are finding ways to replace various
types of machines with simple combinations of materials. This saves money,
improves miniaturization capability, and confers other advantages.
Non-fossil electricity generation, small-scale and distributed. This
confers many competitive advantages to manufacturing, but also to the
average person if rolled out widely. A real game-changer.
Battery technology. Obama had originally wanted 1 million electric cars
added to our coal-demanding power plant load. Obviously not good for us, but
compounded by the high-pollution, limited-supply lithium problem. New types
of batteries using cheap, low-pollution materials combined with the
aforementioned electricity source--another game changer. Look for Obama's
employers to stymie development.
3D printing. Over the past few years, there's been a reversal of the
manufacturing loss from the USA; it's called "onshoring." The ability to
make plastic (and in some cases metal) object on demand via "printing" them
is partially responsible for this.
Nanotechnology. Relate to materials technology, it's already made huge
inroads in everything from medicine to manufacturing.
Robotics. No, I'm not talking about the robots in CONgress who are
programmed by Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Bankstering, and other predators. I'm
talking about materials and machines that accomplish work (something that
most members of CONgress are genetically incapable of). The advances are
amazing, and they are a huge factor in defeating the Obama agenda.
Yes, we still have 51% unemployment. But this particular cloud has several
silver linings For example:
The progress of the Obama job elimination plan has been halted. Despite
the Obama team's best efforts, unemployment is not getting any worse. The
advances above help explain that.
Look at where we started at the beginning of Obamageddon. We have huge
potential, which can be realized just by repealing some of the Obama job
destruction mislegislation. A lot of people can be put back to work, with
just the stroke of a pen. For example, repealing Obummercare (the Patient
Predation and Job Destruction Act).
It's also possible that Obama will "hang it up" in 2016 rather than inflict
us with a third term. He's reached his goal of being Worst POTUS of all time,
having set records of destruction that are orders of magnitude greater than what
even the worst deviants did before him. There is some controversy as to whether
he's actually worse than Wilson because Wilson gave us the IRS, the nonFederal
nonReserve and two world wars. But the CONgress has had 100 years to abolish the
IRS; the fact it exists is their bad, not Wilson's. Ditto the nFnR.
As for those two wars, the combined cost was $2 trillion. In 2012 alone,
Obama's deficit was $6 trillion (according to the GAO). He out-Wilsoned Wilson.
So he has the title. What more can he want? It seems unlikely that his
employers would let him do enough damage to be the last POTUS by dint of totally
destroying the USA. That may be his ultimate goal, but it seems larger forces
won't permit that.
Backing this conclusion is the fact that the Supreme Court recently did a
smackdown on Obama's illegal redefinition of "recess" and that vote was
unanimous. For Obama to claim that he, in the executive branch, can define when
Congress is in recess rather than Congress declaring it's in recess is too much
even by this lax Court's standards. Apparently, Obama's employers instructed
this normally permissive "court" to reign him in a little bit. And that is very
Because Obama has brought the country so close to the brink of total failure,
there's good chance the criminals who control our fake elections will select a
different type of agent on the next go-round. Someone far less destructive, and
probably with instructions to de-Obamafy so much of what happened in the
preceding 8 years. At least, that's a hope we can hold onto for now.
What if you had a device that
translates anything you say?
The LUX2 does that, and more. Its speech to speech translation feature works
Press the microphone image (it’s big, use your thumb if you want to),
and watch the screen turn red.
Lift your thumb, and hear the translation.
The LUX2 does that between any two of 84 languages, with no internet
connection required. The voice is natural, the accuracy is amazing, and it can’t
get any easier.
Not only can the LUX2 translate anything you say, it has a camera and can
translate anything it sees. Can’t understand the road sign? No problem! The LUX2
will tell you what it says.
Here’s some of that “more” we mentioned just a moment ago:
Android operating system for speed of operation and ease of use.
A whole suite of text translation and language learning tools.
Over 3,000 useful apps, including Skype and a browser.
Enormous battery (3350 mAH), for long use between charges.
All this, and still small enough to fit in your pocket (it folds up).
And we have good news on how to save money when doing that. Through Amazon, we
are providing the LUX2 with free shipping. If you have Amazon Prime, it’s free
second day air. With Amazon’s easy return policy, there’s no reason not to try
the LUX2. Take advantage of this limited time sale and try the LUX2 today:
Being disinformed is worse than not being informed at all; avoiding sources of
disinformation makes you smarter.
Because it's worse to be disinformed than to be uniformed, I don't do news.
However, I do tap sources via which I become well-informed, albeit at the
sacrifice of timeliness.
If you do want to be informed AND totally current, is there a source? Yes, but
it's not the state-run propaganda system. You can get accurate reporting from
The Daily Show. While Jon Stewart's original angle was to parody the news for
the sake of comedy, the show has become the only "mainstream" source of actual
While "conservatives" lambasted Stewart during "President Cheney's" reign of
error (remember the tortured "logic" of the torture memos?), Stewart isn't a
flaming liberal. This fact became evident during Ron Paul's last run for The
White House. The Daily Show was the only major news outlet that didn't pretend
Paul wasn't running. In fact, Paul led in fund-raising and in opinion polls
before the state-run propaganda machine turned the nascent election into the
4. Finance tip
Thinking people object to Obummercare (aka, the Unaffordable Care Act) for many
reasons. Most of these have to do with its profoundly adverse effects on the
cost of medical insurance. But this illegal, morally repugnant mislegislation
has all kinds of garbage inserted into it. Like a slew of new taxes.
Thanks to Howard for sharing. And in case you didn't get it, here's the
answer: Submit to the WTO or you will be attacked. For more about this
issue, read the book, "Confessions of an Economic Hitman."
Wars do not create wealth; they only destroy property and kill people.
The wars "we" send our troops to fight shrink the market for American-made
goods, damage our international standing, increase our national debt, and
are generally toxic to all of us. Not only that, they strengthen the
position of the very criminals who prey upon us.
What can you do about this? The banksters own the major political party
in the USA (the Demopublicans or Republocrats, depending on how you want to
refer to this crime cartel). When going to the polls to vote in our fake
federal "elections" don't surrender your vote to The Party. Vote in the
affirmative for law and order instead: vote Libertarian.
That's one thing you can do. Another is to avoid sending your money to
the big banks. For example, if you have checking account with Banksters of
America move it to a small regional bank or a credit union.
There are many other things you can do to help end these wars. Take some
time to be totally mindful (no multitasking) and sit quietly, thinking about
it. The answers will come.
6. Health tip/Fitness tips
Thanks for your responses to this newsletter. Some of these lead me to develop
material specifically to answer reader questions or comments. Such as this one:
"I really don't care about being lean or ripped. What I care about is cancer.
People don't die from not having a six-pack, but they die from cancer all the
This comment gives me a great opportunity to explain why being lean is so
valuable (ripped is nice, but not necessary).
Three decades ago, one in four Americans got cancer. Today, it's one in two.
So, I acknowledge cancer as an important issue.
Now, let's look at what I eat to be ripped. Basically, the diet is
nutrient-dense and calorie-sparse. It's green-based rather than grain-based. I
also enjoy spices such as turmeric and pepper. Eating these foods (instead of
the processed grain stuff) will make you lean; lean vs. ripped is mainly a
matter of how much you eat and how intensely you exercise.
The foods "ripped people" eat are all highly anti-carcinogenic. And they
taste great with spices. Spices also are highly anti-carcinogenic. In fact, if
you combine turmeric and pepper, the effect is so profound it does to cancer
cells what Obama has been doing to the economy.
But wait, it gets better.
Not only does the nutrient-dense diet kill cancer cells, it greatly reduces
how many are created in the first place. The brown belly fat that so many people
are carrying around is basically a cancer factory.
In fact, for every 10 pounds of this fat an average height man has on his
body, his prostate cancer risk goes up an order of magnitude; that's not merely
double, it's 10X. This is why the medical establishment says that all men
eventually develop prostate cancer. They are wrong, of course.
What's really going on is most American men
have double-digit body fat and thus are making cancer cells the way
Columbian drug cartels print counterfeit money. The bodies of the really fat
guys (those carrying 25% or more fat) create cancer cells the way the
nonFederal nonReserve inflates the money supply.
If you can't see at least
the outline of your abs, you're too fat. It means you are eating too much,
eating the wrong things, or both. Now, I need to put this in perspective.
The reason most men are so fat and so many are getting cancer is their diet
is a carcinogen-rich meat and grain-based diet. The fat is bad, but what
they eat to get fat is the main culprit.
Eating the foods that keep you lean dramatically reduces your cancer
risk. You add to your cancer risk with excess body fat, but how much is
truly excess is disputed. If we apply a little logic here, we can conclude
that eating right and letting your body find its own optimal level is
probably sufficient. But don't take that as a license to overeat.
One way to see if your cancer risk is too high is to just look at your
belly in the mirror. If your body fat hides your abs, you need to be more
careful about what you put on your plate and in your mouth. You don't need
to stress out over it, though.
Women have an extra layer of belly fat, so an adequately lean woman won't
have the definition an adequately lean man will have. But an adequately lean
woman will still have a hint of a "four pack" showing. If you're a woman,
aim for that. Men can simply use a body fat scale and stay in the single
Remember that what most matters is what you're eating, because what you
eat hugely affects your cancer risk. It's just not the case that a man with
10% body fat is a health basket case while a man with 6% isn't. The former
can't see his abs, which is a shame. But the latter probably has only a
marginally better cancer risk profile. The man at 25%, however, is a health
basket case. And he didn't get that way on a nutrient-dense diet.
The nutrient-dense diet kills cancer cells. If you aren't as lean as you
would like to be but are eating that lean diet, maybe just try eating a bit
less but not really worrying about it. It is probably better to be happy and
have a little too much body fat than to be stressed out about it. If you're
eating right, the lean look should just happen. If it doesn't, keep eating
right but just not as much. Maybe take up a sport to burn some calories. Or
walk a dog. Or whatever you can take pleasure in. I think a weight training
regime is ideal, but not everyone finds it suitable. Find something suitable
for you, and do it.
Yes, there are still many other cancer risk factors. Such as the
chemicals dumped into our air, water, and soil. But this particular risk
factor--diet--is one you can easily control. You just need to decide to do
that. You can magnify the benefits by eliminating common carcinogens from
your home: bleach, scented soaps and shampoos, various cleaning solutions,
and particle board furniture.
www.supplecity.com, you'll find plenty of informative, authoritative
articles on maintaining a lean, strong physique. It has nothing to
do with long workouts or impossible to maintain diets. In fact:
The best workouts are short and intense.
A good diet contains far more flavors and satisfaction
than the typical American diet.
Zero is the only number that cannot be represented by Roman numerals. It is,
however, represented by the collective IQ of the US CONgress.
8. Thought for the Day
Disinformed people not only don't know that they don't know, what they think
they know is wrong.
Please forward this eNL to others.
The views expressed in this e-newsletter are generally not shared by criminals, zombies, or brainwashed individuals.
Except where noted, this e-newsletter is entirely the work of Mark Lamendola. Anything presented as fact can be independently verified. Often, sources are given; but where not given, they are readily available to anyone who makes the effort.
Mark provides information from either research or his own areas of established expertise. Sometimes, what appears to be a personal opinion is the only possibility when applying sound logic--reason it out before judging! (That said, some personal opinions do appear on occasion).
The purpose of this publication is to inform and empower its readers (and save you money!).
Personal note from Mark: I value each and every one of you, and I hope that shows in the diligent effort I put into writing this e-newsletter. Thank you for being a faithful reader.
Please pass this newsletter along to others.