1. Product Highlights
2. Brainpower tip
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
When I give my time management seminars (http://www.timespeaker.com),
people always ask about e-mail. It seems most folks feel overwhelmed by
their e-mail systems. They tend to blame spam, but that is not a core
problem. In fact, the whole spam thing is is grossly exaggerated.
There are two core problems with e-mail:
What is e-mail captivity? It's analogous to phone captivity. Have you ever been in a conversation, when the other person suddenly whips out a cell phone and answers it? As though you aren't there? Sure, this is rude. But it's also inefficient. During the day, how often are you answering e-mail? That is, how badly are you fragmenting your schedule, how poorly are you concentrating, how much are you diverting your attention away from priority items? Back in the days when movies and books first started showing characters using e-mail, the writers of these stories adopted an odd model: AOL. Anyone who's not a newbie knows AOL provides an awful online experience and it's so expensive as to fall into the "rip off" category. AOL did bring a large number of people into the online community via aggressive promotion. But an AOL user who tries any alternative to AOL instantly wants to switch. So it was weird for most of us to see the AOL-based way characters were accessing e-mail. One of the "features" was a voice announcing, "You've got mail." That cute but annoying "feature" has inculcated people with the notion that they have to answer e-mail as soon as it arrives. That, like the phone call taking notion, is untrue. Schedule times for handling e-mail, and/or answer it between other activities. Don't interrupt or delay other activities just so you avoid unanswered e-mail in your inbox. I get hundreds of e-mails a day, and do not feel overwhelmed by them. Nor do I feel any need to answer them right away. I pretty much empty my inbox every day, so I do handle incoming e-mail rather than let it pile up. I just don't feel compelled to answer it as soon as it comes in. One way I keep my inbox uncluttered is I place low priority items into one of two folders: ToDo and DelayRead. I do this manually. I do not use (or trust) automated filing of incoming e-mail, except for the junkmail function. Your incoming e-mail will require one of these actions:
My e-mail doesn't pile up or overwhelm me, because I separate the important from the urgent from the unimportant. I feel no need to answer it instantly. From the above, you already know my opinion of Instant Messaging. If you want to be inefficient and insane, then IM to your heart's content. If you want efficiency and sanity, don't do IM. I have several other e-mail tips topics slated for this column. |
The single largest expense an American has is taxes. Citizens of other
countries have a similar problem. Unfortunately, few of us understand just
how expensive these taxes are. Here, I'm going to address:
Purposes of taxation. In their order of where the money goes (sources: OMB and NTU):
Why tax structures are so complex. Why are taxation structures so mind-blowingly complex? Very simple reason: People who know they are doing something wrong usually don't want to advertise what they are doing. This is why you don't hear your "representatives" say things like, "I voted to take an extra $725 from you every year from this point forward and flush it down the tax toilet--in addition to the $32,000 we are already swiping from you and flushing down the toilet for no good reason. Do you want to re-elect me, now?" On the federal level, your "representatives" make more than four times the median income. The median income is about $40,000 and hasn't changed for the last five years. But Congress has had no problems voting themselves raises. The rationale they give for this is simply bizarre. They spend their days figuring out how to reduce your standard of living, while failing to end federal funding of the world's largest and most vicious terrorist organization (a three letter abbreviation, the first letter being "I"). Personally, I don't think these folks have earned a single penny of the largesse they are paid each year. Not with that glaring failure on their record. Cost of taxation. Taxes suck capital out of the economy, which is why a tax cut actually increases government revenues by spurring the economy and creating jobs. The more we are taxed, the more money we have going to the first five items bulleted above--none of which provides any value whatsoever to the taxpayer. But, how much are you really taxed? Let's take a look:
Total cost of taxes: The estimates vary between 75% and 90% of income. Remember that the prices of everything you buy are severely inflated by taxes. So what you see on your paystub is only a fraction of your real tax bill. This is exactly what politicians want. Just like other parasites, they are hiding while the suck the life force out of their hosts. They continue to ignore the idea of actually representing the public, and they stay in office. This craziness needs to end, but it won't end until we all stop deluding ourselves about the enormous cost of "government." What not to doYou have no doubt read the propaganda from tax protestors. Most of their speil focuses on the federal income tax, which, as we know, is not center stage in the typical American's overall tax picture. These people are advocating that you cheat on your federal income taxes (their "legal arguments" never hold up in court, right or wrong). So, here's the logic: "Use Strategy X and cheat on your federal income taxes, thereby reducing your overall tax bite from 85% to 73%." OK, so there's a potential upside. But they don't finish the thought here. "...And risk everything you own, including future earnings for the next 25 years--knowing the failure rate of this course of action is roughly 99.999%." Let's do the math, for a middle-aged person earning $40k (today's median wage). You save $4,800. Great. To do that, you put at risk your $60,000 of home equity, your $30,000 car, your $180,000 retirement accounts, and the $1.4 million you expect to earn between now and retirement. And that risk is, statistically speaking, a certainty. Oh, and by the way--you must stay current on your other tax obligations even when you have put yourself in this horrible position. Clearly, it is not prudent to "boycott the federal income tax." In fact, it's the financial equivalent of bungee jumping 100 feet with a 150 foot rope. So while tax protesting can feel good on the way down, you inevitably have to hit the pavement of reality. A more intelligent approach is called for. What you can doTo fix any problem, you must attack it at its source. Where do taxes come from? Elected officials! If you want to lower taxes from their present punitive rates, you go to the source. What do you tell these people? If you do the math, you can see that--even if all taxes were cut in half--taxes would still be punitive. This should be plenty motivating. But it also means:
Officials will claim they have budget shortfalls, and thus taxes must rise. Counter this by identifying three or four budget spending items that can be reduced or eliminated. Officials who can't manage money any better than a drug addict simply do not deserve to be re-elected. But they know that enough brainwashed people will vote for them no matter how careless they are with your money. So, it's pointless to threaten not to vote for them or to expose their profligate ways--the election results show this doesn't matter. What you need to do is explain to individual officials how cutting program X and recovering most of that money for more important programs (while creating a small net dent in spending) helps them stay in office because it creates a more focused benefit in the electorate. For you to do this, you'll need to do some research and some thinking. But surely, you're capable. Considering how much you "spend" on "government," taking action here is one of the best things you can do for your finances. A huge upside to working on this problem is it gives you enormous benefits in brain exercise--see our brain tips in this issue. |
More about
alarm systems, and thanks for your positive comments about our locksmith tips
in recent issues. Before buying an alarm system:
Remember that alarms, like everything else, can fail. And alarms, like other security measures, are just part of total security strategy. Ask your police department to give you a free home security assessment. Following their recommendations will go a long way toward keeping you from being an attractive break-in target. Don't "discuss" their recommendations, debate, or argue. Listen, take notes, and thank them. Cops see the aftermath of crimes, and they aren't just "offering another opinion." |
|
What do more Americans die from than anything? Well, OK. Forget about
the IRS for now. Let's talk about tragedies you can prevent. This killer is heart disease. And Americans actually purchase it. So the key to preventing it is to stop buying it. Don't put heart disease in your shopping cart at the grocery store. Don't order heart disease from the restaurant menu. Stop buying heart disease via your cable TV subscription. And by all means, don't buy heart disease in those little pocket-sized disease dispensers that come with the Surgeon General's warning on the label. Your heart is only as healthy as what you eat. If a "food" is processed, then you are probably buying heart disease when you buy that "food." Rather than memorize a bunch of rules or try to figure out which foods are "bad," adopt the principle of "less processing is better." For example, eat strawberries rather than strawberry cheesecake. Eat plain oats, rather than instant oats. Eat free-range eggs, rather than those "cheaply priced, but oh do you pay dearly" factory-farmed eggs. Tip: Rather than read labels, choose foods that don't even have labels. You will find them in the produce department. Make a habit of this, and your risk of heart disease plummets to near zero (assuming you don't have environmental risk factors or a genetic defect in your heart). Now, here's a tip for the time-rushed who don't want to purchase heart disease. Prepare your own meals, rather than buy frozen dinners and the like. "But wait," you say. "I can pop a frozen dinner in the microwave and have it in just a few minutes. That's a lot quicker than making my own meal." Point taken. But it's a point that looks at the wrong data. It's also true that if you don't tie your shoes before running a marathon you will save some time. But the performance drag you stick yourself with actually costs you time. When you eat nutritious, non-toxic meals, you simply work faster and better. The time you invest in a proper meal pays back in multiples throughout the day in efficiency alone--but you also eliminate a major cause of heart disease and other illnesses. If you're concerned about the time invested in decent meals, then count the total costs. How? Talk to your doctor. Say you are trying to decide whether to purchase heart disease in a box (frozen dinners, fast food, etc.) to "save time," or invest time to prevent heart disease and other illnesses. Ask your doctor to give you an estimate of how many hours it would take to treat heart disease in the first year of treatment, and how many hours it would take to treat colon cancer in the first year of treatment for that disease. Ask if it's more efficient to get both diseases at the same time, or if you should focus your junk food intake on getting first one and then the other. Does this sound like a ridiculous conversation? It's certainly less ridiculous than zeroing in on one benefit (a few minutes saved now) while ignoring the huge costs. Let me be clear. Eating junk food does not simply add some risk for disease. It guarantees illness in the near future, hugely raises the risk of catastrophic illness (from near zero to near certain) later in life, and absolutely causes an immediate performance penalty. But if your excuse for eating junk food, fast food, and the other "time-saving" garbage peddled as food fit for humans is that you "don't have time to eat right," then count the real time loss that such an approach incurs. You are not saving time. You are losing huge amounts of it. So take a look at the real numbers. Find out how many hours you will spend in diagnosis, surgery, recovery, therapy, and outpatient treatment. Add to that the long waits in waiting rooms, transportation time, and so on. Assuming heart disease doesn't kill you prematurely (this is a poor assumption--it would be more accurate to assume a time loss of 20 years), you'll have a fair handle on the actual time you lose by "saving time" via costly junk food. I have never bothered to count these time costs, so I can't tell you what they are. My motivation for eating a non-disease diet is I don't want the misery, pain, and loss of functionality. I want to enjoy life. Don't you? Call me crazy, but I don't think heart attacks and colon cancer are enjoyable. Just my opinion, based on reports from those who've been there, done that. You may prefer lying in a hospital bed with your guts cut up to walking in the park or making love to your spouse. If you've already been through this kind of misery, then you know what I'm talking about (and you probably wish you'd have known about the consequences of choices made years ago). I also have this oddball preference of spending 20 years engaging in life with other people, rather than getting a 20 year head start on occupying a coffin. I know some folks who've skated to the edge of the abyss and changed their food choices. So, I'm really going by their experience and advice. Maybe that's not so odd, after all. Don't give in when someone entreats you to join in stupidity. When someone wants you to eat junk and says, "Oh, come on, enjoy life a little," a good reply is, "No thank you. I'd rather enjoy life a more than just a little." |
|
|
Everything is a decision--even indecision is a decision. |
Wishing you the best,
Mark Lamendola
Mindconnection.com
To subscribe, change your e-mail address, offer your own tidbit, tell us how much you love this eNL, ask how to put us in your will <grin> or to (gasp) unsubscribe, write to comments @ mindconnection.com (paste that into your e-mail client, and remove the spaces).
Let other potential readers know what you think of this e-zine, by rating it at the Cumuli Ezine Finder: http://www.cumuli.com/ezines/ra22225.rate
|