| Review
of
Words That Work,
by Dr. Frank Luntz (Hardcover, 2007)
Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.
If you're looking for magical words that will imbue you with the power
to get people to do your bidding, you won't find them here. What you will
find, instead, is something based on reality.
One of the things that bothers me about "non-fiction"
titles these days is most authors assume the book is their pulpit for
pushing their personal (and usually irrational) political views. Even if
those views have nothing whatsoever to do with the topic of the book,
and even if their "supportive arguments" defy logic, they feel compelled
to slip that stuff in. I've pointed out examples of this in some of my
other reviews, and it is more the rule
than the exception.
When I came across this book, authored by a figure who
works primarily in the political arena, my nonsense detector went on red
alert. And it turned out to be a false alarm.
Drawing on a wide base of facts and correctly applying
logic, Dr. Luntz has produced a valuable work of nonfiction. The book
sticks to the subject it promises to cover, and covers it well. Dr. Luntz also avoids engaging in pop psychology,
which was another welcome relief. Instead, he presents
his findings, provides intelligent explanations, and illustrates points
with specific (and often well-known) examples.
The book spends most of its time looking at why
some messages get mangled and others don't. It provides
general practices to help you clearly communicate your intended message. This information is
timeless; it will be as valid a century from now as it is today. The
book also contains some information that will eventually be outdated but is
useful today. For example, Chapter 12 discusses twenty-one words and
phrases that work. They work in the present time, based on present
perceptions and current events.
Some reviewers of this book
deride Dr. Luntz as a "spin doctor." Their use of that
emotionally-charged term is classic manipulation--exactly what they
accuse Dr. Luntz of. Their accusation is both false and
irrelevant. This book isn't about spinning.
It's about how to communicate clearly and not undermine your own
message.
Some reviewers of this book deride Dr. Luntz as a "right wing partisan." As he has worked for
leading Democrats, this accusation is, like the other one, without
merit.
A note about labels
The "left" or "right"
labels are normally misapplied. Ted Kennedy, for example, is allegedly a
liberal. The truth is that he's a statist who misuses
liberal ideas when they suit his statist agenda; he is not a person who
serves liberal ideals. On the sliding scale between government control
and personal freedom, his pointer is all the way at the bottom
(government control).
For most of America, neither the left nor the right offers
much that they agree with. The practice of framing every political
problem as left vs. right issue misses the reality that the real clash is between statism and
personal freedom. Dr. Luntz didn't
touch on this in his book, which is OK because--contrary to what some
reviewers have said--it's not a political book. But since they put that
on the table, let's take a moment to look at facts rather than
emotionally-laden, misapplied labels.
Government has grown with the speed and malignancy
of cancer. In the USA, the federal government is now 185
times larger than it was 100 years ago. The geographic area of the USA
is not 185 times larger than it was in 1907, when it had 46 states
instead of today's 50. Nor is the USA population of 300 million 185
times more than its 1907 population of 87 million. Why, when in the
private sector, advancements in productivity allow one person to do the
job of tens or hundreds, does the federal government need hundreds of people to
do the job of one?
To see stupidity incarnate, look only to
government. The flavor of stupidity, left or right, doesn't really
matter. The question of whether an anchor chained to your left leg will drag
you to ocean floor faster than one chained to your right leg is rather
silly, when you think about it. And so are people who use left vs. right
labels while ignoring statism--a classic "elephant in the living room"
situation if there ever was one.
Consequently, these silly critics of Dr. Luntz
have, with their own words, discredited themselves. They
could have avoided this self-defeating behavior by using the insights
provided in Chapter 9.
Some book details
The first chapter, as you might expect, lays out
the ground rules. I have found this practice to be fairly consistent in
"How To" books--the first chapter summarizes what you need to know.
Then, the subsequent chapters expand on that to give you the
understanding. Some authors will devote one chapter per point, with the
first chapter serving essentially as a hefty outline of the book. Other
authors will use the first chapter as a 'basis of understanding" so that
the rest of the book makes sense, and they'll keep referring back to
this or that principle. This second method is more or less the one Dr. Luntz chose.
While the first chapter gives you a thumbnail
strategy for effective communication, the second chapter reveals the
other side of the coin: mistakes not to make. The next two chapters take
this same front/back of the coin approach. We read about old words that
have new meanings, then we read about how new words (that work) are created.
The next two chapters repeat this approach.
First, Dr. Luntz talks about how to "be the message" (choosing the words
that reflect your identity) and then he addresses how people remember
that message.
In Chapters 7 and 8, we see this front/back
approach once more. First, we read corporate case studies and then
political case studies. Chapter 9 takes an interesting look at myths
and realities regarding language and people, with both opinion and fact
presented. The next chapter discusses Dr. Luntz' views on what people
really care about and then he provides a chapter on personal language
for personal scenarios.
Overall, I found this to be a logical presentation
on an important and useful topic. As many experts have noted, there's a
huge problem with personal communication. It's especially bad in the USA and even
worse in Canada. Yes, there are good communicators in both countries.
But generally, people have adopted shrillness and histrionics in place
of articulation. I've read several experts' theories on why this is so.
I've also read several good books on how to communicate without the
shrillness and histrionics. Dr. Luntz' books is one of those. Dr.
Stephen R. Covey is perhaps the most noted author of such books.
A theme that Dr. Luntz brings to the forefront and
then refers to repeatedly, is stated in his subtitle. "It's not what you
say, it's what people hear."
An example of how this theme works is this.
Suppose you have a problem with another person. If you start out by
inflicting some insult on that person, your message is likely to consist
only of the insult. The rest of it is lost. But if you take the approach
that you share a common problem and a solution can benefit both of you,
then the other person hears what you're saying about the content. That's
not spin. That's treating people with respect. And this is what Dr.
Luntz' book is really about.
Why you need this book
If you want to read a book that is helpful,
informative, and interesting, then you should pick up a copy of Words
That Work. Take the time to think through the concepts being presented,
examine the corporate and political case studies, and review your own
daily communication patterns. You'll be glad you did.
If you've been reading and applying Stephen R.
Covey's principles, especially "seek first to understand," you will find
this book a valuable addition to your collection. If you've never read
any books in this genre, Words That Work is just as good as any to start
with. |