| Review of
Ultimate Punishment, by Scott Turow (best-selling author of Presumed
Innocent and other novels). Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola.
I’ve liked Turow's novels ever since I
read Burden of Proof. When I first began reading Ultimate
Punishment, I was disappointed that it was non-fiction because I
had so looked forward to another gripping tale from Turow. My disappointment
soon gave way to keen interest. And then to intense fascination.
Turow handled the topic so well, he had
me challenging my own long-held beliefs. Whether you are for or against
capital punishment, Turow's treatment of this topic will have you doing
the same. This begs the question of what Turow was doing writing a non-fiction
work, and one about the death penalty at that.
Scott Turow has served as both a prosecuting
attorney and a defense attorney in capital cases. When the governor
of Illinois tapped him to serve on a special commission to investigate
and report on the Illinois death penalty, he began a journey through
a system that was far more broken than anyone had realized. What he
reveals in this book reminds me of the depravity Senator Roth revealed
in his book about the IRS. When the government runs amok, justice is
merely an abstract concept—not a reality.
Serving on the commission required Turow
to do intensive research and analysis, and he shares the results of
that with the reader. Turow's views were different coming out of the
experience than they were going into it. And so were those of nearly
everyone on the commission.
In this book, Turow looks at the arguments
both for and against the death penalty - both the fallacious ones and
the solid ones. He shows us how the underlying assumptions of public
policy fail to square with what really goes on. The book isn't a diatribe
against the death penalty, nor is it an endorsement for it. Instead,
it's a remarkably thoughtful look at all of the issues.
The world would be a much better place
if all public policies underwent such a thoughtful exploration and evaluation.
Sadly, they don’t. Whether they hear a capital case or one of lesser
import, our courts would serve society better if every judge, attorney,
and potential juror read Ultimate Punishment. If you fall into
one of those three categories, you should consider this book required
reading. |