Book Review of Trend Commandments
electronic translators, electrical exam prep, scanners, spy gadgets, dvr, hidden cameras, weather radios
Bookmark and Share
Products Articles  Book Reviews  Brainpower Newsletter Contact Us      Home  Search

 

This page is the original source of this review, though you may also find it on Amazon or other sites.

Book Reviews Home   Free Audio Books
Trend Commandments

Book Review of: Trend Commandments

Trading For Exceptional Returns

Price: $13.51
List Price: $25.99
You save: $12.48 (48%)

Availability: Usually ships within 24 hours
Click on the image to order or find more books like this.

Review of Trend Commandments, by Author (Hardcover, 2011)

(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you want a hardcopy)

Reviewer:

Having read and reviewed The Complete Turtle Trader, a previous work by Covel, I readily agreed to read and review Trend Commandments. This book is philosophical and conceptual in nature. It doesn't present a "foolproof system" in cookie-cutter fashion, under the idea that you just do these steps and you can't lose. Anyone looking for such a book can do just as well picking up the scam of the day (which this book is definitely not).

This book lays the groundwork for any trader who wants to succeed. That brings us to the question, "What is a trader?" In the world of alleged investing, there are two types of players: investors and traders. Most people do not understand the distinction. So, I'll explain.

An investor is someone who owns part of a company and is "invested" in it by virtue of more than just money plunked down. That person has a long-term, active interest in ensuring the success of that company. And a personal stake. The word "invest" is key, here; look up its etymology and history. A true investor can't invest in very many companies at the same time. There simply is not enough of that person to go around.

You might invest in your brother in law's machine shop, for example, and because you are invested you provide some resources to help it succeed. Maybe you make business contacts, or perhaps you handle vendor negotiations. You probably sit on this company's board. You are not concerned much with its stock price, but you sometimes lie awake at night thinking about its cash flow. That's investing. You are, in a sense, wearing (like a vest) the business. It's part of what you put on each day.

Then there is trading. People who think they "invest" in mutual funds are not investors. They have no stake in the companies owned by the fund and typically can't name three of the top ten the fund has shares in. They are traders, despite the language abuse that pervades our society.

Another way to look at this would be rentals. If you buy two or three rental houses that you plan to hang on to as your long-term business, you are an investor. You're managing those investments and taking the risks. What happens with those particular houses is important to you and you can probably answer any questions anyone asks about the costs and condition of those houses.

But if you buy into a real estate mutual fund, you probably have no idea what is going on with any particular property. You are concerned only with the return on your investment, as evidenced in the share price.

The share price concept is key, here. Keep it in mind. It's something Covel comes back to again and again in this book.

Covel castigates "buy and hold," and that stance is correct regarding stock and commodity traders in general. I think for mutual funds, it's incorrect, because the fees and tax compliance costs involved in switching and trading seldom justify moving from one fund to another. For true investors, of course, it's all about buy and hold. But for traders, that strategy is normally based on emotion rather than results.

Covel correctly points out that the famous "buy and hold" star Warren Buffet isn't actually a "buy and hold" guy. He's made tens of billions doing the opposite. Is he really going to advise other people to emulate him and thus dilute his profit potential? Not likely.

Trend Commandments helps the reader overcome misconceptions and bias in the area of financial trading. Covel's basic point is that if you want to get exceptional returns, you have to follow the trends. In particular, pricing trends.

Earlier, I pointed out the difference between investors and traders. As you can imagine, an investor is very concerned about the fundamentals of the company. An investor looks at the financials, the operations, and other factors that affect profitability and long-term viability. This is very time-intensive. And it's why most people who think they are "investors" are actually traders. They aren't invested, they are merely hoping to trade from a lower buy price to a higher sell price. And typically get panicked into doing the reverse.

But wait, you say. What about the stockbroker who sends me research on a company I want to buy stock in? Well, read the research. What's its point? To predict where the stock price is headed. Based on what? Based on things that don't determine the stock price. Those things you're reading about are fundamentals, and while logic dictates they should predict stock price direction, history shows they do not.

This sad fact of life is well-documented in several works, including Mobs, Messiahs, and Markets, and in other books by Covel. So if you are a trader, you can't rely on fundamentals to guide you. What, then, is a reliable means of predicting the stock price direction? The answer to that question is what this book is about. If you're a trader, you need that answer.

This book consists of 241 pages, plus a 4-page bibliography that is pretty much a "must read" list for any serious trader. It's written in Covel's recognizable and enjoyable style.

 

 

 

About these reviews

You may be wondering why the reviews here are any different from the hundreds of "reviews" posted online. Notice the quotation marks?

I've been reviewing books for sites like Amazon for many years now, and it dismays me that Amazon found it necessary to post a minimum word count for reviews. It further dismays me that it's only 20 words. If that's all you have to say about a book, why bother?

And why waste everyone else's time with such drivel? As a reader of such reviews, I feel like I am being told that I do not matter. The flippancy of people who write these terse "reviews" is insulting to the authors also, I would suspect.

This sound bite blathering taking the place of any actual communication is increasingly a problem in our mindless, blog-posting Webosphere. Sadly, Google rewards such pointlessness as "content" so we just get more if this inanity.

The reviews I do will, contrary to emerging trends, actually tell you about the book. I always got an "A" on a book review I did as a kid (that's how I remember it anyhow, and it's my story so I'm sticking to it). A book review contains certain elements and has a logical structure. It informs the reader about the book.

A book review may also tell the reader whether the reviewer liked it, but revealing a reviewer's personal taste is not necessary for an informative book review.

About your reviewer

  • Books are a passion of mine. I read dozens of them each year, plus I listen to audio books.
  • Most of my "reading diet" consists of nonfiction. I think life is too short to use your limited reading time on material that has little or not substance. That leads into my next point...
  • In 1990, I stopped watching television. I have not missed it. At all.
  • I was first published as a preteen. I wrote an essay, and my teacher submitted it to the local paper.
  • For six years, I worked as an editor for a trade publication. I left that job in 2002, and still do freelance editing and authoring for that publication (and for other publications).
  • No book has emerged from my mind onto the best-seller list. So maybe I'm presumptuous in judging the work of others. Then again, I do more describing than judging in my reviews. And I have so many articles now published that I stopped counting them at 6,000. When did I stop? Probably another 6,000 articles ago! (It's been a while).
  • I have an engineering degree undergrad and an MBA. That helps explain my methodical approach toward reviews.
  • You probably don't know anybody who has made a perfect or near perfect score on a test of Standard Written English. I have. So, a credential for whatever it's worth.

About reading style

No, I do not "speed read" through these. That said, I do read at a fast rate. But, in contrast to speed reading, I read everything when I read a book for review.

Speed reading is a specialized type of reading that requires skipping text as you go. Using this technique, I've been able to consistently "max out" a speed reading machine at 2080 words per minute with 80% comprehension. This method is great if you are out to show how fast you can read. But I didn't use it in graduate school and I don't use it now. I think it takes the joy out of reading, and that pleasure is a big part of why I read to begin with.

Articles | Book Reviews | Free eNL | Products

Contact Us | Home

This material, copyright Mindconnection. Don't make all of your communication electronic. Hug somebody!