| Review
of
The Writer's Journey, by Christopher Vogler (Paperback, 1998)
(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you
want a hardcopy)
Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.
Having written over 6,000 magazine and Web articles,
I'm not your average frustrated writer wondering why an agent hasn't
signed me onto a $3 million book deal for my badly written novel. On the
other hand, I have authored a few badly written novels. These,
fortunately for most readers, have not been published.
The last novel I tried to write ended up being a poster
child for "writing yourself into a corner." An article is normally 800
to 1500 words, so a different area of knowledge comes into play. I just
can't seem to put together a novel-length work that doesn't read like a
bunch of loosely connected articles. Such a work isn't a pleasure to
read.
I don't like the idea of taking a creative writing
class from someone who is teaching a creative writing class rather than
enjoying the fruits of having successfully published a novel. This may
be a silly viewpoint, but it's the one I have. Also, many authors who
have never sat in such a class have been very successful. In an attempt
to start learning how to tell a good tale of novel length, I picked up a
copy of The Writer's Journey.
I read some of reviews that panned the book as peddling
worn-out story structures that pretty much guarantee any writer who
takes the book seriously won't have a dollar's chance in Congress of
surviving (in case that metaphor escapes you, Congress burns
money----why rerun the old snowball cliché?). But none of the reviewers'
names were familiar to me, so I concluded these folks were non-achievers
who have an ego-driven axe to grind.
If these structures were so 'worn-out," would that not
mean that they underpinned many a successful book or screenplay? Vogler
analyzed several movies that I enjoyed immensely, and those works
followed this "worn-out" structure. If you think about houses, you will
realize there aren't a great many structural variations compared to the
vast number of floor plans, carpet choices, window placements, interior
colors, sidings, landscaping, and other elements that give a home its
own character. That's one reason those reviews did not dissuade me from
reading this book.
Many reviews also give you a chapter by chapter
breakdown. Since my repeating that doesn't add anything, I'm taking a
different approach.
My every attempt to outline a novel has had dismal
results. The next "new novelist" book I will get is going to address the
subject of outlining. The reason why is I now understand a general
structure for outlining. The purpose isn't to try to connect a series of
scenes you've written. I have been doing this all backwards (I could use
another Congress metaphor, but will resist the urge).
As Vogler states, you can use any structure you want
and you can use any variation of the hero's journey (the structure that
is the topic of this book). He calls it "a form, not a formula." The
point is that you need to start with the structure and then work your
way downward in the hierarchy of detail. This book is devoted to
analyzing a structure found in a vast number of successful works.
Not having ever taken a writing class, I don't know if
this is a fundamental concept that every MFA understands. But, I doubt
it. I subscribe to three different magazines for writers, and have been
a subscriber to one for about a quarter century. I've not run across
this hero's journey concept before. Perhaps in a writing class, this is
what you learn as the way to outline a book. Certainly, in grade school
we learned how to construct a hierarchical outline using Roman Numerals
and so the concept really isn't all that surprising. And, of course,
everyone knows how to use MS-Word's collapsible outline feature (rather
than paper index cards--yuck).
The twist here is the Roman Numeral portion of your
outline, if it follows the hero's journey discussed in this book, will
consist of Act One, Act Two, and Act Three. Each of those will then
break down into capital-lettered components that each serves a specific
purpose. For example, what will be the First Threshold your hero
crosses? After you decide that, you can flesh it out.
I think if you have done a fair amount of writing, read
dozens of books each year, have the composition skills needed to compose
a work in Standard Written English, and have a way with words, you may
stand a chance at writing a decent novel. The question then becomes one
of what story you want to tell. But, you need a structure for that to be
any good.
What do you write, most often? An e-mail is probably
100 words or less. A personal letter might be 400 words. A Web article,
800. A magazine article, 1500. Now, consider the novel. You aren't going
to get an agent to consider one that's less than 60,000 words. But it
can't be an article stretched out to 20 times its normal size. It needs
an entirely different structure. Simply sitting down and pouring your
heart out isn't going to get the job done.
People may argue that Vogler's book sets writers on a
path of mass production. But if you think again of the house analogy,
you see that isn't true. Vogler's analysis of many great works will help
any writer better understand the structure behind a novel. Even if the
novel you want to write has nothing to do with heroes, you can apply
this same concept of structure. If you aren't a published novelist, add
this book to your reading list. |