| Review
of
The Theory of Natural Systems, by Maria L. Costell Gaydos (Paperback, 2004)
(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you
want a hardcopy)
Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.
Over the past few years, I've read several books that discuss quantum
mechanics and related physics. As I read The Theory of Natural Systems,
it became obvious to me that the author, Dr. Gaydos, has read more
extensively on those subjects than I have.
Plus, she has a doctorate in chemistry and significant experience in
that field.
The goal of her book, The Theory of Natural Systems, is to
prod the medical research community to explore an alternative to the
standard protocol of "burn you, poison you, cut you" that
conventional medicine follows
in response to cancer and AIDS (and most other ailments). About half the book lays the foundation
for getting to the logic from which springs the conclusion.
Dr. Gaydos covers some heavy material without making the
reader's eyes glaze over. Maybe her explanations seem straightforward
to me because I have a quantitative background and am used to
seeing concepts expressed via the methods she uses. If you don't have a
quantitative background and you don't have an interest in science, then
you may find this book a bit daunting. If so, then you will also find the effort to read it does not go unrewarded.
Dr. Gaydos followed the
traditional thesis format of presenting facts, then arguments, then
conclusions, then recommendations.
This is in stark contrast to the increasingly
common practice of peddling fiction as
nonfiction (e.g., An Inconvenient Truth, which was inconveniently
untrue) to push a personal agenda. Too many authors (and speakers and
screen-writers) cherry-pick facts and/or present false
assertions as fact to support a presumptive conclusion, regardless of
overwhelming evidence refuting that conclusion.
In addition to playing fair in the intellectual
realm, good science books educate the reader. This one is no exception.
By reading The Theory of Natural Systems, I received a several well-presented lessons in the
fascinating fields of quantum physics, astrophysics, chemistry, and
biology. Any one of these, by itself, is worth the "price of admission."
The concept of evolution is a cornerstone of science, and most
disciplines of science are impenetrable unless you grasp this concept. Reading The Theory of Natural Systems
helped deepen my understanding of the evolutionary process, and it
helped me see how it applies to systems of all types--even star systems.
Consequently, reading this book has improved my ability to understand
and enjoy other scientific texts I will read in the future.
Side note: I was distraught when the Kansas legislature caved in
to people who are highly vocal about their sixth century beliefs. Kansas
undermined education in science
by making it public policy to deny the Theory of Evolution. In scientific
parlance,
the word "theory" does not mean "maybe." Fortunately, the damage of this
bad policy soon became clear and the
legislature promptly repealed it. Unfortunately, some of that damage was
permanent. For example, prominent researchers in Life Science relocated
to Europe out of concern for their school-age children.
Providing a summary of this book is challenging, to say the least.
That's not because of some deficiency in the text, but because
the text is so rich. So, I will make do with comments on selected
chapters (there are sixteen of them).
After discussing the concept of identity and its relation to reality
in Chapter One, Dr. Gaydos postulates in Chapter Two that the universe
itself has identity and can make decisions. Chapter Two builds to its
conclusion that elemental particles have free will.
Chapter Six explores general and universal laws. Here,
Dr. Gaydos lays the
groundwork upon which she later mathematically shows the absurdity of
the idea that our orderly universe got this way by chance. In this
chapter, she uses the social order of bees to illustrate several
important points.
Up to Chapter Ten, Dr. Gaydos has taken us step by step from
elemental particles to successively more complicated systems. For
example, elemental particles combine to form atoms, which combine to
form molecules. This combining continues: complex molecules,
organic acids, organic proteins, cells, organs, body systems, man (she
also discusses the inorganic progressions, including crystals). Each
member of each system subordinates its will to the system (just as bees
submit to the will of the hive). This all congeals in the Chapter Ten
discussion of internal control.
With Chapter Eleven, Dr. Gaydos moves into discussing cancer in terms
of the concepts she provided in the preceding ten chapters. The next
several chapters move that discussion forward, as she makes and supports two central ideas:
- Cancer cells are not invaders (as are viruses), but are the
body's own cells that the body has ceased to control. Therefore, it
is logical that they will cease to be cancerous if this control can
be reasserted. Cancer is a genetic disorder, not a viral or
bacterial one.
- AIDS, like cancer, is a genetic disorder and therefore
requires a genetic cure. The evidence supports the conclusion that
AIDS is a disorder of the DNA. There's no reason for human DNAs to
succumb to an AIDS attack, because human DNAs have a more powerful
organization, are acting in their own territory (the human body),
and are being helped by the accumulated inductive control of the
organism.
Dr. Gaydos brings some interesting facts to bear in her arguments
supporting these central ideas and other conclusions. Consider, for example, her mathematical
analysis of the relative energy and information levels of errant DNA
versus normal DNA. In that discussion, she makes us wonder, "Trillions of
healthy DNAs, and one DNA goes amok? How can that one DNA overwhelm all
of the others?" She provides some insights to
help answer these and other questions.
In Chapter Fifteen, Dr. Gaydos brings us back around to her earlier
discussions of the intelligence of matter (at various levels of
succession and stages of evolution), decision-making, the structure of things, how the universe
manages information. In Chapter Sixteen, she then makes the case for addressing
problems in these very areas as the causes of cancer and AIDS.
She proposes that there are opportunity costs (not her wording)
involved in sinking all of our efforts into the traditional "burn you,
poison you, cut you" protocols that don't cure either disease. She
proposes that we use some resources to develop instrumentation that can
be used to pursue a genetic cure. That cure would consist of voluntary
control over the genetic machinery.
One of the startling facts Dr. Gaydos presents in her "it really is
possible" arguments is the documented experiment in which a person
controlled one brain cell (there are 10 billion cells in the brain),
using clinical feedback. She provides a reference for this, so the
skeptical reader is free to investigate the veracity. Dr. Gaydos
presents other startling facts, as well. Many of our common notions
about our limitations are simply wrong.
Dr. Gaydos makes a compelling case that it's time
to set some of those notions aside. She closes with a plea for
government and private funding. We already have a $9 trillion debt that
is growing by over half a billion dollars a day and a tax load that
stretches the very meaning of "obscene." The USA spends more on its
military than the next nine nations combined. What if we spent only as
much as the next eight nations combined and used the leftover funds to
facilitate this research? Don't hold your breath; the pharmaceutical
industry, which would naturally oppose this research, has two full-time
lobbyists for each member of Congress. The money will come from
the private sector if it comes from anywhere.
I give this book my "must read" rating and label
it a keeper.
A note on the language "bumps" in this work
Dr. Gaydos' ideas flow very well from her chemist mind. But if you're
not used to authors whose native language is something other than
English, the way she says some things will sound strange. Dr. Gaydos,
while now living in the USA, is from Spain and spent considerable time
in Italy.
As a manager in an international company (Mindconnection, LLC), I
work with people all over the world. As an American, my knowledge of
other languages is poor (I can dabble in half a dozen, but am fluent
only in English). Using an electronic translator helps, but people in
other countries carry most of the translation load by speaking English.
When they do, I notice little things like the missing articles (e.g.,
"the") or word variations that are logical but incorrect. You
will notice such things when reading this book.
But, let's take this in context. Give a random sampling
of American authors a test of Standard Written English (American, not
Oxford), and most will fail. An example is John Grisham, a wildly
successful author. While Grisham does tell a good story, he doesn't tell it in good
English. To the
typical American ear, the errors go unnoticed because those particular
errors are so ubiquitous as to be normal.
In the nearly 400 pages of this work by Dr. Gaydos, there is not a
single misplaced modifier or a single sentence of parallel construction.
Few American-born authors can say that about their books.
|