| Review
of
The Big Burn, by Timothy Egan (Softcover, 2009)
(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you
want a hardcopy)
Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.
Engaging and informative, this book makes a fine addition to anyone's
history library. Egan has raised the bar in this genre. His writing is
masterful.
Maybe it's just an illusion, but it seemed the tone of this book is
patterned after the subject matter. There's a little spark and kindling
at first. It's warm and inviting, just as a small fire is. Then the
story blazes to life, and as the reader you are caught up in it and feel
the full intensity of its heat.
Though Roosevelt, mentioned in the subtitle, was the most famous
person in this book, other figures are of historical significance. For
example, Ed Pulaski is prominent in the book and is famous in certain
circles. Ask any forest ranger about Ed Pulaski or the tool Pulaski
invented. If you've been to Las Vegas, you probably know it's in Clark
County. That county is the namesake of a prominent figure in this book.
Perhaps the second largest figure in this book, though, is Gifford
Pinchot. Incidentally, Pinchot was born at about the end of the American
War of Succession (incorrectly called the Civil War in history books
though it did not meet the definition of a civil war--which is a war for
taking over the means of government rather than attempting to leave it)
and died at about the end of World War II. He was really the force
behind the conservation movement. John Muir, also famous for
conservation, lacked Pinchot's political skill. Without Pinchot, it's
unlikely we'd have national parks today. And for sure we wouldn't have
park rangers. The original lead rangers, in fact, were called "Little
GP's. " Thanks to GP, Roosevelt established the Park Service in 1905.
Integral to the story of the big fire of 1910 is the story of the
Park Service. Some big business folks wanted to make big money by
denuding and destroying the nation's forests for the lumber. To protect
their interests, they did then what their descendants do today: buy and
sell members of CONgress, plus presidents (Taft, back then) and others
in positions of authority.
I like a sign that's on Dr. Ron Paul's desk: "Don't steal. The
government doesn't like competition." The battle over the "right" to
steal and to use the federal government as the tool of theft was intense
during the time in which this story occurred. Given this, it's amazing
to me that Egan stayed on the story at hand. He could have used the
story of the Big Burn (and the background intrigues) to comment on
current events, but didn't. He told the story as accurately and
objectively as he could, leaving out any proselytizing for particular
political views. Yes, he did talk a bit about the big social programs
launched by T.R. (and later pushed more by his cousin FDR), but only as
statements of fact. Kudos!
Thanks to all the chicanery and greed, the Park Service was
underfunded. The funding games were the primary means by which the
lumber grabbers sought to kill off the Park Service as part of a larger
scheme to remove the forests from the public domain.
What happened in 1910 was a "perfect storm" of events that led to a
fire so massive that it released more energy than the bomb dropped on
Hiroshima. It destroyed millions of acres of forest, huge swaths of land
larger than several New England states.
A nearly snowless winter followed by a nearly rainless summer left
the trees and brush excessively dry. This created a situation in which
there were hundreds of little fires all over the place. The rangers went
about putting these out. But then an unusual wind condition arose. When
dry timber and small fires get hit by a massive hurricane-level wind,
the result is an enormous conflagration like the one that hit in 1910.
Egan does a great job of describing this fire, referring to how it
jumped over long distances, shot up 100+ ft columns of flame, created
its own wind vortexes, and so forth. As long as it can reach fuel, it's
an unstoppable force. The rangers had no way of knowing this, at the
time.
Egan created a narrative from the various historical accounts, and
provides just enough detail to keep the story moving and not so much
that it bogs down. Writing about a century after the fact, Egan wasn't
able to interview eye witnesses. Surely much of the material he combed
through was aggrandized over time and many important facts were lost,
altered, or created from broadcloth. But he did his homework (it takes
almost 20 pages to list his sources) and everything fits together into a
narrative that is as accurate as possible. And he tells it so well!
This book runs about 300 pages. It's preceded by a note from the
author and then a Prologue, both obviously well thought out. The book
consists 19 chapters arranged into 3 Parts, followed by an extensive
list of sources, acknowledgements, and an index.
Part I consists of 5 chapters, and it's here that Egan describes how
TR and Pinchot started the conservation movement. He then moves on to
give us a real feel for the challenges they faced. The opposition was
intense, and how these two men answered those challenges is a great
story in itself.
Part II is the story of the fire. As it's the core of the book, this
story occupies 11 chapters. Here, we learn about how many small fires
turned into one colossal, raging, consuming inferno. We read about
heroes, cowards, and those in between. We sense, not just read about,
the fear, disorientation, desperation, and hope that arose in the
various people. We feel the tragedy and the loss, too.
Part III consists of only 3 chapters. This is the story of what
happened after the fire. Part of that story includes the federal
government's utter disregard toward the rangers and civilians severely
injured by the fire. Part of it is following up on what happened with
various people who played key roles during the fire. And part of it is
just bringing an excellent book to a proper end.
I'd never heard of Timothy Egan prior to reading this book. Now I
want to read his other books. Maybe I'll start with his previous one,
"The Worst Hard Times," which was about the Dust Bowl. |