| Review
of
How I Killed Pluto, by Author (Hardcover, 2010)
(You can print this review in landscape mode, if you
want a hardcopy)
Reviewer:
Mark Lamendola, author of over 6,000 articles.
This book provides great insight, from the astronomer's viewpoint, of
a branch of science that has spawned countless movies, books, television
shows--both fiction and non-fiction. This branch of science inspired a
now iconic speech given by President Kennedy at Rice University, in
which he challenged the nation to send men to the moon and bring them
safely back to Earth.
That discipline of science, of course, is astronomy. This book
details a series of events in the life of astronomy Mike Brown, and it
centers on the concept of what a planet is. The answer isn't a matter of
semantics, and by the end of this book the reader understands why.
Well written and factually accurate, this book takes us into the work
and personal life of a now famous astronomer. Brown explains how and why
he ended up being an astronomer, and he helps the reader see the
relevance of astronomy to our everyday lives. We get to see behind the
curtain, too. Astronomers are actually human.
Pick the characteristic that makes a person most outstanding in
his/her field, and you find that same characteristic annoying at times.
Just as you want your accountant to be "anal retentive," you find this
same characteristic keeps that person from being the life of the party.
The attributes that make a person a great engineer also make that person
get under the skin of other people.
In the case of an astronomer, it really helps to be obsessive.
Otherwise, you're likely to give up because the "results" are so rare. A
person who needs instant gratification is unlikely to last as an
astronomer. We see Brown is an obsessive person, and he even points this
out. He's obsessive about his work, and he's obsessive about his wife
and daughter. The possessiveness about his daughter is probably humorous
to most people (being an engineer and MBA myself, I find this behavior
"normal" but realize most other people do not), especially when you read
about the charting of data online.
My primary goal when I read about astronomy is to become more
informed on the science of it. I hadn't expected to be informed on the
human side of it, intrigued, and entertained. But that's what this book
delivers. We find in here, for example, a conflict arising from
primate dominance instincts. You may recall the opening scene from 2001:
A Space Odyssey, in which an ape throws a bone and it tumbles over and
then morphs into a space station in 2001 (my recollection may be a bit
inaccurate due to time, but that's the gist of it). This symbolism
wasn't there by accident. By coincidence, I was listening to an
audiobook on primate behavior when I started this book and another
audiobook "The Ape in the Corner Office" as I finished it. The two
audiobooks explain perfectly some of the events that Brown relates.
Basically, even astronomers will sacrifice science to get their primal
primate needs met. The same problem exists in many other areas of
science.
This truth exposes us to dangerous ground, intellectually. If
you examine that collection of fiefdoms / monkey tribes known as the US
Federal Govt, you find this primal primate behavior drives everything.
Scientists in this environment are basically there for window dressing,
seldom being listened to by the top apes. In the typical large
corporation, same thing. The whole "Is Pluto a planet" question is
easy to answer scientifically. However, getting a logical answer made
official after Brown's discovery of "the tenth planet" almost did not
happen. Brown provides both sides of the story, here. Actually, there
are more than two sides; think in terms of a polygonic shape. In the
end, Brown did get the ruling body of astronomical nomenclature to adopt
a logical, scientific, supportable answer. In this book, Brown shows how
he did it and how it almost did not happen. This book is a quick read,
even though it's just over 250 pages. After about the first third of the
book, the pace accelerates and I had a hard time putting it down past
that point. This book consists of 13 chapters, a prologue, an
epilogue, acknowledgements, and an index. The copy I read was an advance
copy printed about four months before the official release date.
Normally, I find mechanical errors all throughout such a pre-release. I
guess it's because Brown is an astronomer (thus obsessive and
anal-retentive) that I cannot recall a single error. Contrast that to
the typical non-fiction release, and we have an object lesson in just
how competent Brown is when it comes to getting details right. Even
details that are not in his particular field. I enjoyed this book, and
I recommend it to anyone with an interest in what it might be like to be
a scientist. |